The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geographical variation in seed production, predation and abortion in Juniperus communis throughout its range in Europe
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1 The geographical variation of seed production, predation and abortion was analysed in Juniperus communis for 31 populations in seven distinct regions throughout the species’ distribution range in Europe, including both the northern and southern boundaries. 2 The number of seeds per cone and the number of filled seeds per cone varied significantly between geographical regions and among populations within regions. Populations from the Mediterranean mountains (south‐east Spain) showed the highest values in the number of seeds per cone but the lowest values in the number of filled seeds per cone. 3 Losses due to predispersal seed predation varied significantly among populations within a region but not between regions, suggesting that predation incidence depends on local‐scale factors. Seed abortion rates were higher in southern Iberian populations than in the other regions, and varied significantly among populations and regions. As a result of predation and abortion, seed production was lowest in the Iberian regions. 4 Seed abortion showed a significant quadratic relationship with latitude, with higher values of abortion at either end of the gradient, but particularly at the southern limit. 5 The production of filled seeds declined gradually towards both northern and southern distribution limits. In the Mediterranean mountains (southern limit), low seed production coincided with a marked limitation placed upon natural regeneration by summer drought, leading to a demographic bottleneck in populations. Although seed abortion levels were relatively high in the subarctic tundra (northern limit) populations, they were free from predispersal seed predators, suggesting that population viability here may be under less pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analyzing Tables of Statistical Tests
Rice, W. R. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409177 · Cited by 14,571
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Cited by
Geographic range limits: achieving synthesis
Gaston, K. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1480 · Cited by 594
Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species
Sagarin, R. D., Gaines, S. D., & Gaylord, B. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.008 · Cited by 507
Pironon, S., Papuga, G., Villellas, J., Angert, A. L., García, M. B., & Thompson, J. D. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12313 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- García, D., Zamora, R., Gómez, J. M., Jordano, P., & Hódar, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 435-446
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2005890648
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geographical variation in seed production, predation and abortion in Juniperus communis throughout its range in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00459.x
- The paper
- García, D., Zamora, R., Gómez, J. M., Jordano, P., & Hódar, J. A. (2000). Geographical variation in seed production, predation and abortion in Juniperus communis throughout its range in Europe. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00459.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.