The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities
Abstract
Summary: Because related species tend to be ecologically similar, it has long been recognized that the phylogenetic relationships between species in a community are likely to influence its structure. Previous investigations of the influence of phylogeny on community structure have generally shown that congeneric species are more frequent than would be expected if communities were randomly assembled. Because, under most theories of coexistence, stable coexistence requires ecological differences between species, the apparent excess of coexisting congeners suggests that trait differences important to coexistence must be recently evolved, arising near the tips of phylogenetic trees. We test this hypothesis in two meadow plant communities for which we have good evidence of niche segregation along axes defined by hydrological conditions. Niche overlaps were calculated and compared against null models for (i) all species in the community, (ii) species within genera, (iii) genera within families, (iv) families within the eudicots and monocots, and (v) eudicots and monocots. Against expectation, we found that community structure was the cumulative result of niche separation arising at a range of phylogenetic levels and therefore that niche differences have been accumulated through the evolutionary history of species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Community Assembly, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptive Evolution in Changing Environments
Ackerly, D. D. (2003) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/368401 · Cited by 893
Rabosky, D. L. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01333.x · Cited by 448
The dimensionality of ecological networks
Eklöf, A., Jacob, U., Kopp, J., Bosch, J., Castro‐Urgal, R., Chacoff, N. P., Dalsgaard, B., de Sassi, C., Galetti, M., Guimarães, P. R., et al. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12081 · Cited by 339
Functional trait differences influence neighbourhood interactions in a hyperdiverse Amazonian forest
Fortunel, C., Valencia, R., Wright, S. J., Garwood, N. C., & Kraft, N. J. B. (2016) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12642 · Cited by 83
Diversity–productivity relationships in two ecologically realistic rarity–extinction scenarios
Isbell, F. I., Losure, D. A., Yurkonis, K. A., & Wilsey, B. J. (2008) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16692.x · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Silvertown, J., Dodd, M., & Gowing, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 428-435
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2108683999
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00553.x
- The paper
- Silvertown, J., Dodd, M., & Gowing, D. (2001). Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00553.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.