Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensis

Vergeer, Philippine, Rengelink, Ramses, Copal, Annemieke, Ouborg, N. Joop·2003·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: We studied the performance of 17 Dutch populations of the perennial Succisa pratensis, in relation to population size, genetic variation and habitat quality. We used a path‐analytical model to analyse the possible relationships between these variables and performance. Plants in smaller populations produced fewer seeds per flower head. Their seeds had lower germination rates and higher seedling mortality, and more seeds were dormant or non‐viable. Population size was also correlated with genetic measures. Small populations had higher inbreeding coefficients than large populations and observed heterozygosity was positively correlated with population size. The mean genetic diversity (expected heterozygosity) was relatively high (H exp = 0.42), but not correlated with population size. Less eutrophic habitats appeared to support larger populations. High concentrations of NH 4 and NO 3 in the soil were significantly negatively correlated with population size. Path‐analysis showed that Succisa pratensis is vulnerable to habitat deterioration (eutrophication). Population size was strongly influenced by habitat quality. Reduced performance, however, was better explained by direct genetic effects and by habitat deterioration rather than by effects of population size per se. Both habitat quality and genetic effects are thus important for population persistence, even in the short term. The results suggest that there will be a continuing decline of the small populations, due to deteriorating habitat conditions, decreased genetic variation and a reduced reproductive capacity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00736.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Vergeer, P., Rengelink, R., Copal, A., & Ouborg, N. J.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-31
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
18-26
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2135483754
Cited by
182
References
1
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00736.x
The paper
Vergeer, P., Rengelink, R., Copal, A., & Ouborg, N. J. (2003). The interacting effects of genetic variation, habitat quality and population size on performance of Succisa pratensis. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00736.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.