The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individual variations of platelet inhibition after loading doses of clopidogrel
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Järemo P, Lindahl TL, Fransson SG, Richter A (Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden). Individual variations of platelet inhibition after loading doses of clopidogrel. J Intern Med 2002; 252: 233–238. Objective. To investigate individual variations of platelet inhibition after clopidogrel‐loading doses. Setting. Department of Cardiology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden. Subjects. Individuals with stable angina pectoris (n = 18) subject to percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and subsequent stenting were investigated. Methods and experimental protocol. A 300‐mg clopidogrel loading dose was administrated immediately after stenting (day 1) followed by an additional 75 mg clopidogrel after 24 h (day 2). The ADP‐evoked platelet fibrinogen binding was analysed to estimate platelet reactivity immediately before angiography and on day 2. A flow cytometry technique was used with two ADP solutions (final concentrations 0.6 and 1.7 μmol L−1) employed as platelet activating agents. Soluble P‐selectin was used as a marker of platelet activity. Results. When using 1.7 μmol L−1 ADP to activate platelets four individuals had a strong inhibition (i.e. platelet reactivity <10% of the day 1‐value day 2). In contrast, five patients demonstrated a weak inhibition (i.e. platelet reactivity >60% of the day 1‐value day 2). Similar results were obtained when using 0.6 μmol L−1 ADP as a platelet‐activating agent. Clopidogrel, however, fails to suppress platelet activity as estimated from soluble P‐selectin. Conclusions. Clopidogrel evoked platelet inhibition exhibits a considerable individual heterogeneity. Some individuals only had weak responses whereas others displayed strong platelet inhibition. The present flow cytometry technique appears suitable for identifying patients with abnormal reactions after clopidogrel exposure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gurbel, P. A., Bliden, K. P., Hiatt, B. L., & O’Connor, C. M. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000072771.11429.83 · Cited by 1,544
Patrono, C., Coller, B., Dalen, J. E., Fitz Gerald, G. A., Fuster, V., Gent, M., Hirsh, J., & Roth, G. (2001) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.39s · Cited by 963
Montalescot, G., Sideris, G., Meuleman, C., Bal-dit-Sollier, C., Lellouche, N., Steg, P. G., Slama, M., Milleron, O., Collet, J.-P., Henry, P., et al. (2006) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.090 · Cited by 527
Erlinge, D., Varenhorst, C., Braun, O. Ö., James, S., Winters, K. J., Jakubowski, J. A., Brandt, J. T., Sugidachi, A., Siegbahn, A., & Wallentin, L. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.068 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Järemo, P., Lindahl, T. L., Fransson, S. G., & Richter, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 252
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 233-238
- ISSN
- 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2796
- OpenAlex
- W2074491742
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual variations of platelet inhibition after loading doses of clopidogrel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01027.x
- The paper
- Järemo, P., Lindahl, T. L., Fransson, S. G., & Richter, A. (2002). Individual variations of platelet inhibition after loading doses of clopidogrel. Journal of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01027.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.