Cited by 13Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disorders

Residual insulin secretion is not coupled to a maintained glucagon response to hypoglycaemia in long‐term type 1 diabetes

Open access
Sjöberg, S., Ahrén, B., Bolinder, J.·2002·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate the influence of residual β‐cell function on glucagon secretion and glucose counter‐regulation following hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. Design and subjects. The hormonal counter‐regulatory responses to standardized insulin‐induced hypoglycaemia were investigated, 18 patients with type 1 diabetes of long duration and 12 healthy subjects were investigated. Nine of the diabetic patients (diabetes duration 17 ± 1 years) had residual insulin secretion, as reflected by persistent urinary C‐peptide excretion. The other nine diabetic patients (diabetes duration 21 ± 1 years) were C‐peptide negative. Results. Similar hypoglycaemic nadirs were found in all groups (2.1–2.3 mmol L−1), whereas the recovery of plasma glucose levels was delayed similarly in the diabetic groups. In the control subjects, plasma glucagon increased (∼50%). No significant glucagon response was registered in either of the two diabetic groups. The maximum plasma adrenaline and pancreatic polypeptides (PP) responses to hypoglycaemia were comparable in the two diabetic patient groups; the peak values being lower (P < 0.05) than in the controls. Plasma noradrenaline, growth hormone and cortisol responses to hypoglycaemia were similar in all three groups. Conclusion. Residual β‐cell function in patients with long‐term type 1 diabetes is not accompanied by preservation of the glucagon response to hypoglycaemia. As the two markers of autonomic function (adrenaline and PP) were similarly reduced in the two diabetic groups, the findings instead favour the concept that the defective glucagon secretory response to hypoglycaemia is because of autonomic nervous dysfunction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.01043.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glucagon response declines with age of diabetes; counterregulatory response wanes with duration of diabetes following a logarithmic relationship.

    “it has been shown that glucagon secretion is dependent on the duration of diabetes; 15-17 that is, counterregulatory response wanes with duration of diabetes 15 following a logarithmic relationship.”

    From The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator: New Features (2014) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Introduction says that people with type 1 diabetes usually develop a diminished glucagon response to hypoglycaemia within a few years of onset, and the Discussion reports a deficient response in patients with long-standing disease. Neither section establishes that the response declines according to a logarithmic relationship with diabetes duration. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 13

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Amiel SA, Tamborlane WV, Sacca `L, Sherwin RS. Hypogly- caemia and glucose counter-regulation in normal and insu- lin-dependent diabetic subjects. Diabetes Metab Rev 1988; 4: 71-89.

Authors
Sjöberg, S., Ahrén, B., & Bolinder, J.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Sjöberg, S.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10
Volume
252
Issue
4
Pages
342-351
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2044095101
Cited by
13
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, residual beta-cell function, glucagon secretion, hypoglycemia, autonomic dysfunction, epinephrine, pancreatic polypeptide, C-peptide, long-standing diabetes, glucagon response
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Epinephrine, Female, Glucagon, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypoglycemia, Infusions, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Polypeptide, Radioimmunoassay, Growth Hormone, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review