The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyper‐Reactive Hypothalamo‐Pituitary‐Adrenocortical Axis in Rats Bred for High Anxiety‐Related Behaviour
Abstract
Psychiatric patients suffering from anxiety disorders or endogenous depression exhibit increased activity in their hypothalamo‐pituitary‐adrenocortical (HPA) axis. Recently, two Wistar rat lines, bred for high (HAB) and low (LAB) anxiety‐related behaviour on the elevated plus‐maze, were described as a unique psychopathological animal model (1). The present study focused on the HPA axis reactivity of HAB and LAB animals to an emotional stressor. Thus, adult male HAB and LAB animals, fitted with jugular vein catheters 5 days prior to the experiment, were exposed to an open arm of the elevated plus‐maze for 5 min. Whereas basal levels of ACTH and corticosterone were similar in both lines, HAB rats showed higher plasma concentrations at 5 and 15 min following stressor exposure (both hormones and both time points: P<0.01 vs LAB). Furthermore, increased basal (P<0.05 vs LAB) and stimulated (P<0.01 vs LAB) prolactin concentrations in HAB rats were found. In contrast to ACTH, corticosterone and prolactin, plasma oxytocin and vasopressin levels did not differ between HAB and LAB animals; oxytocin, but not vasopressin, responding to open arm exposure with a significant increase in both lines (P<0.05). In conclusion, particularly due to the association between inborn anxiety and HPA axis hyper‐reactivity, the HAB rat represents a promising animal model for further investigation of the relationship between emotional disturbance and neuroendocrine activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunn, A. J., & Berridge, C. W. (1990) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(90)90012-d · Cited by 1,352
Wotjak, C. T., Ganster, J., Kohl, G., Holsboer, F., Landgraf, R., & Engelmann, M. (1998) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00683-0 · Cited by 345
Cited by
Mikkelsen, K., Stojanovska, L., Polenakovic, M., Bosevski, M., & Apostolopoulos, V. (2017) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.09.003 · Cited by 1,072
Landgraf, R., & Neumann, I. D. (2004) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2004.05.001 · Cited by 1,059
Oxytocin: The Great Facilitator of Life
Lee, H.-J., Macbeth, A. H., Pagani, J., & Young, W. S. (2009) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.04.001 · Cited by 1,037
Corticosteroids in relation to fear, anxiety and psychopathology
Korte, S. M. (2001) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00002-1 · Cited by 607
Effects of exercise and physical activity on anxiety
Anderson, E., & Shivakumar, G. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00027 · Cited by 602
Metadata
- Authors
- Landgraf, Wigger, Holsboer, & Neumann
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 405-407
- ISSN
- 0953-8194 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2826
- OpenAlex
- W1911182391
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyper‐Reactive Hypothalamo‐Pituitary‐Adrenocortical Axis in Rats Bred for High Anxiety‐Related Behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2826.1999.00342.x
- The paper
- Landgraf, Wigger, Holsboer, & Neumann. (1999). Hyper‐Reactive Hypothalamo‐Pituitary‐Adrenocortical Axis in Rats Bred for High Anxiety‐Related Behaviour. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2826.1999.00342.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.