Cited by 234Circadian rhythm and melatoninPlant Molecular Biology ResearchLight effects on plants

DNA microarray analyses of circadian timing: the genomic basis of biological time

Duffield, G. E.·2003·Journal of Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

Many aspects of physiology and behaviour are organized around a daily rhythm, driven by an endogenous circadian clock. Studies across numerous taxa have identified interlocked autoregulatory molecular feedback loops which underlie circadian organization in single cells. Until recently, little was known of (i) how the core clock mechanism regulates circadian output and (ii) what proportion of the cellular transcriptome is clock regulated. Studies using DNA microarray technology have addressed these questions in a global fashion and identified rhythmically expressed genes in numerous tissues in the rodent (suprachiasmatic nucleus, pineal gland, liver, heart, kidney) and immortalized fibroblasts, in the head and body of Drosophila, in the fungus Neurospora and the higher plant Arabidopsis. These clock controlled genes represent 0.5-9% of probed genes, with functional groups covering a broad spectrum of cellular pathways. There is considerable tissue specificity, with only approximately 10% rhythmic genes common to at least one other tissue, principally consisting of known clock genes. The remaining common genes may constitute genes operating close to the clock mechanism or novel core clock components. Microarray technology has also been applied to understand input pathways to the clock, identifying potential signalling components for clock resetting in fibroblasts, and elucidating the temperature entrainment mechanism in Neurospora. This review explores some of the common themes found between tissues and organisms, and focuses on some of the striking connections between the molecular core oscillator and aspects of circadian physiology and behaviour. It also addresses the limitations of the microarray technology and analyses, and suggests directions for future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2003.01082.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 10% of the transcriptome in any given mouse tissue is under circadian control.

    “Although there is some variability between studies and methods, it is generally accepted that ~10% of the transcriptome in any given mouse tissue is under circadian control.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 234

Authors
Duffield, G. E.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Duffield, G. E.
Venue
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-10
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
991-1002
ISSN
  • 0953-8194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2826
OpenAlex
W1929552083
Cited by
234
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
Keywords
circadian clock, clock-controlled genes, circadian rhythm, tissue-specific gene expression, suprachiasmatic nucleus, pineal gland, Drosophila, Neurospora, Arabidopsis, clock resetting, temperature entrainment
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Circadian Rhythm, Drosophila, Transcription, Genetic, Arabidopsis, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Genomics, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review