DNA microarray analyses of circadian timing: the genomic basis of biological time
Abstract
Many aspects of physiology and behaviour are organized around a daily rhythm, driven by an endogenous circadian clock. Studies across numerous taxa have identified interlocked autoregulatory molecular feedback loops which underlie circadian organization in single cells. Until recently, little was known of (i) how the core clock mechanism regulates circadian output and (ii) what proportion of the cellular transcriptome is clock regulated. Studies using DNA microarray technology have addressed these questions in a global fashion and identified rhythmically expressed genes in numerous tissues in the rodent (suprachiasmatic nucleus, pineal gland, liver, heart, kidney) and immortalized fibroblasts, in the head and body of Drosophila, in the fungus Neurospora and the higher plant Arabidopsis. These clock controlled genes represent 0.5-9% of probed genes, with functional groups covering a broad spectrum of cellular pathways. There is considerable tissue specificity, with only approximately 10% rhythmic genes common to at least one other tissue, principally consisting of known clock genes. The remaining common genes may constitute genes operating close to the clock mechanism or novel core clock components. Microarray technology has also been applied to understand input pathways to the clock, identifying potential signalling components for clock resetting in fibroblasts, and elucidating the temperature entrainment mechanism in Neurospora. This review explores some of the common themes found between tissues and organisms, and focuses on some of the striking connections between the molecular core oscillator and aspects of circadian physiology and behaviour. It also addresses the limitations of the microarray technology and analyses, and suggests directions for future studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approximately 10% of the transcriptome in any given mouse tissue is under circadian control.
“Although there is some variability between studies and methods, it is generally accepted that ~10% of the transcriptome in any given mouse tissue is under circadian control.”
From Circadian rhythms, metabolism, and chrononutrition in rodents and humans (2016) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 234
- Authors
- Duffield, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Duffield, G. E.
- ORCID
- Duffield, G. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 991-1002
- ISSN
- 0953-8194 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2826
- OpenAlex
- W1929552083
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Keywords
- circadian clock, clock-controlled genes, circadian rhythm, tissue-specific gene expression, suprachiasmatic nucleus, pineal gland, Drosophila, Neurospora, Arabidopsis, clock resetting, temperature entrainment
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Clocks, Circadian Rhythm, Drosophila, Transcription, Genetic, Arabidopsis, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Genomics, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review