The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A behavioural test to assess daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea
Abstract
Daytime sleepiness is an important symptom of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). The standard tests for its objective quantification use EEG recordings, and are time consuming and expensive, which makes them difficult to use for large studies. This study assesses the ability of a simple test of sustained ‘wakefulness’ to discriminate the excessive somnolence of severe symptomatic obstructive sleep apnoea from normality, and compares its results to the traditional EEG based Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). Ten subjects (7 M 3F) with severe sleep apnoea (>4% SaO 2 dip rate median 32.7 (90% central range 9.7–65.6)) and symptoms of daytime sleepiness, (Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)17(10–24)) and 10 normal subjects (4 M 6F, ESS 3.5(1–8)) were studied. The MWT and the behavioural test (Oxford SLEep Resistance test – OSLER test) were performed on each subject in random order on 2 separate days. The protocol for both tests was the same with 4 × 40 min sleep resistance challenges throughout the day while sound isolated in a darkened room. During the OSLER test subjects were asked to press a switch in response to a light emitting diode (LED), which was lit for 1 s in every three. Both the switch and the light were connected to a computer that stored both the number of times the light was illuminated and whether a correct response was made. The OSLER test discriminated the normal subjects from the sleep apnoea group (mean sleep latency (min) normal group 39.8, OSA group 10.5) as well as the traditional MWT (normal group 38.1, OSA group 7.3) and was much simpler to administer. This test has the advantage that sleep onset is defined objectively and automatically as a failure to respond to the light, rather than from EEG interpretation, which is inevitably partly subjective. This technique may provide a simple and robust method of objectively quantifying daytime sleepiness for large studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
Lévy, P., Kohler, M., McNicholas, W. T., Barbé, F., McEvoy, R. D., Somers, V. K., Lavie, L., & Pépin, J.-L. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.15 · Cited by 1,235
Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement
Oken, B. S., Salinsky, M. C., & Elsas, S. M. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.017 · Cited by 887
Jenkinson, C., Davies, R. J., Mullins, R., & Stradling, J. R. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)10532-9 · Cited by 826
Self-citationWest, S. D., Nicoll, D. J., Wallace, T. M., Matthews, D. R., & Stradling, J. R. (2007) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2006.074351 · Cited by 408
Self-citationThe Epworth Sleepiness Scale may not reflect objective measures of sleepiness or sleep apnea
Chervin, R. D., & Aldrich, M. S. (1999) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.52.1.125 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- BENNETT, L., STRADLING, J., & DAVIES, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Sleep Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 142-145
- ISSN
- 0962-1105 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2869
- OpenAlex
- W2043746499
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A behavioural test to assess daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2869.1997.00039.x
- The paper
- BENNETT, L., STRADLING, J., & DAVIES, R. (1997). A behavioural test to assess daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea. Journal of Sleep Research. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2869.1997.00039.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.