The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping
Abstract
To test whether plucked hairs are a reliable source of DNA for genotyping microsatellite loci, we carried out experiments using one, three, or 10 hairs per extract for 50 alpine marmots. For each extract, seven independent genotypings were performed for the same locus (multiple‐tubes approach). Two types of genotyping errors were recorded: a false homozygote defined as the detection of only one allele of a true heterozygote, and a false allele defined as a PCR‐generated allele that was not one of the alleles of the true genotype. Using DNA extracted from one, three, or 10 hairs, the overall error rate was 14.00%, 4.86%, and 0.29%, respectively. Based on our results, we conclude that 10 hairs should be used to obtain consistently reliable genotypings using the single‐tube approach, and that a single plucked hair could represent a reliable source of DNA if the multiple‐tubes approach is used. For future studies of dinucleotide repeat diversity using DNA extracted from one to three shed or plucked hairs, we strongly recommend initiating an appropriate pilot study to quantify the error rate and to determine the reliability of the single‐tube approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR
Taberlet, P. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.16.3189 · Cited by 1,491
Self-citation
Cited by
Waits, L. P., Luikart, G., & Taberlet, P. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01185.x · Cited by 1,437
Self-citationQuantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics
BROQUET, T., & PETIT, E. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02352.x · Cited by 331
Mowat, G., & Strobeck, C. (2000) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802989 · Cited by 320
Reliable microsatellite genotyping of the Eurasian badger (Meles meles) using faecal DNA
Frantz, A. C., Pope, L. C., Carpenter, P. J., Roper, T. J., Wilson, G. J., Delahay, R. J., & Burke, T. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01848.x · Cited by 266
The city-fox phenomenon: genetic consequences of a recent colonization of urban habitat
Wandeler, P., Funk, S. M., Largiadèr, C. R., Gloor, S., & Breitenmoser, U. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01768.x · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- GOOSSENS, B., WAITS, L. P., & TABERLET, P.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1237-1241
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2130098503
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00407.x
- The paper
- GOOSSENS, B., WAITS, L. P., & TABERLET, P. (1998). Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00407.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.