Genetic structure of the world’s polar bear populations
Abstract
We studied genetic structure in polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations by typing a sample of 473 individuals spanning the species distribution at 16 highly variable microsatellite loci. No genetic discontinuities were found that would be consistent with evolutionarily significant periods of isolation between groups. Direct comparison of movement data and genetic data from the Canadian Arctic revealed a highly significant correlation. Genetic data generally supported existing population (management unit) designations, although there were two cases where genetic data failed to differentiate between pairs of populations previously resolved by movement data. A sharp contrast was found between the minimal genetic structure observed among populations surrounding the polar basin and the presence of several marked genetic discontinuities in the Canadian Arctic. The discontinuities in the Canadian Arctic caused the appearance of four genetic clusters of polar bear populations. These clusters vary in total estimated population size from 100 to over 10 000, and the smallest may merit a relatively conservative management strategy in consideration of its apparent isolation. We suggest that the observed pattern of genetic discontinuities has developed in response to differences in the seasonal distribution and pattern of sea ice habitat and the effects of these differences on the distribution and abundance of seals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The patterns in ABC06 reflect migration between Admiralty Island and mainland US.
“The patterns in ABC06 reflect migration between the Admiralty Island and mainland US, in agreement with previous inferences based on nuclear microsatellites (Paetkau et al., 1999).”
From Population genomics reveal recent speciation and rapid evolutionary adaptation in polar bears (2014) · cites this paper as Paetkau et al., 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 262
- Authors
- Paetkau, D., Amstrup, S. C., Born, E. W., Calvert, W., Derocher, A. E., Garner, G. W., Messier, F., Stirling, I., Taylor, M. K., Wiig, Ø., & Strobeck, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Paetkau, D.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1571-1584
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2106866506
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Polar Research and Ecology
- Keywords
- polar bear, genetic structure, microsatellite markers, sea ice habitat, seal distribution, movement data, Canadian Arctic, genetic groups, population size estimation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arctic Regions, Ursidae, DNA, Dogs, Female, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Male, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Genetic Variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review