The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examination of species boundaries in the Acropora cervicornis group (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) using nuclear DNA sequence analyses
Abstract
Although Acropora is the most species‐rich genus of the scleractinian (stony) corals, only three species occur in the Caribbean:A. cervicornis,A. palmata and A. prolifera. Based on overall coral morphology, abundance and distribution patterns, it has been suggested that A. prolifera may be a hybrid between A. cervicornis and A. palmata. The species boundaries among these three morphospecies were examined using DNA sequence analyses of the nuclear Pax‐C 46/47 intron and the ribosomal DNA Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS1 and ITS2) and 5.8S regions. Moderate levels of sequence variability were observed in the ITS and 5.8S sequences (up to 5.2% overall sequence difference), but variability within species was as large as between species and all three species carried similar sequences. Since this is unlikely to represent a shared ancestral polymorphism, the data suggest that introgressive hybridization occurs among the three species. For the Pax‐C intron,A. cervicornis and A. palmata had very distinct allele frequencies and A. cervicornis carried a unique allele at a frequency of 0.769 (although sequence differences between alleles were small). All A. prolifera colonies examined were heterozygous for the Pax‐C intron, whereas heterozygosity was only 0.286 and 0.333 for A. cervicornis and A. palmata, respectively. These data support the hypothesis that A. prolifera is the product of hybridization between two species that have a different allelic composition for the Pax‐C intron, i.e.A. cervicornis and A. palmata. We therefore suggest that A. prolifera is a hybrid between A. cervicornis and A. palmata, which backcrosses with the parental species at low frequency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Synchronous spawnings of 105 scleractinian coral species on the Great Barrier Reef
Babcock, R. C., Bull, G. D., Harrison, P. L., Heyward, A. J., Oliver, J. K., Wallace, C. C., & Willis, B. L. (1986) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00428562 · Cited by 788
Self-citation
Cited by
Regionally isolated populations of an imperiled Caribbean coral, Acropora palmata
BAUMS, I. B., MILLER, M. W., & HELLBERG, M. E. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02489.x · Cited by 305
van Oppen, M. J. H., McDonald, B. J., Willis, B., & Miller, D. J. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003916 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Oppen, M. J. H. V., Willis, B. L., Vugt, H. W. J. A. V., & Miller, D. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1363-1373
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2135390770
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examination of species boundaries in the Acropora cervicornis group (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) using nuclear DNA sequence analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01010.x
- The paper
- Oppen, M. J. H. V., Willis, B. L., Vugt, H. W. J. A. V., & Miller, D. J. (2000). Examination of species boundaries in the Acropora cervicornis group (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) using nuclear DNA sequence analyses. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01010.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.