The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Heat‐shock and general stress response in Bacillus subtilis
Open accessAbstract
The induction of stress proteins is an important component of the adaptional network of a non‐growing cell of Bacillus subtilis. A diverse range of stresses such as heat shock, salt stress, ethanol, starvation for oxygen or nutrients etc. induce the same set of proteins, called general stress proteins. Although the adaptive functions of these proteins are largely unknown, they are proposed to provide general and rather non‐specific protection of the cell under these adverse conditions. In addition to these non‐specific general stress proteins, all extracellular signals induce a set of specific stress proteins that may confer specific protection against a particular stress factor. In B. subtilis at least three different classes of heat‐inducible genes can be defined by their common regulatory characteristics: Class I genes, as exemplified by the dnaK and groE operons, are most efficiently induced by heat stress. Their expression involves a σ A‐dependent promoter, an inverted repeat (called the CIRCE element) highly conserved among eubacteria, and probably a repressor interacting with the CIRCE element. The majority of general stress genes (class II, more than 40) are induced at σ B‐dependent promoters by different growth‐inhibiting conditions. The activation of σ B by stress or starvation is the crucial event in the induction of this large stress regulon. Only a few genes, including lonclpCclpP, and ftsH, can respond to different stress factors independently of σ B or CIRCE (class III). Stress induction of these genes occurs at promoters presumably recognized by σ A and probably involves additional regulatory elements which remain to be defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Biology and Pathogenicity of Mycoplasmas
Razin, S., Yogev, D., & Naot, Y. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.4.1094-1156.1998 · Cited by 1,930
Dysregulation of bacterial proteolytic machinery by a new class of antibiotics
Brötz-Oesterhelt, H., Beyer, D., Kroll, H.-P., Endermann, R., Ladel, C., Schroeder, W., Hinzen, B., Raddatz, S., Paulsen, H., Henninger, K., et al. (2005) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1306 · Cited by 505
Genome‐wide analysis of the general stress response in Bacillus subtilis
Price, C. W., Fawcett, P., Cérémonie, H., Su, N., Murphy, C. K., & Youngman, P. (2001) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02534.x · Cited by 271
GroEL (Hsp60) of Clostridium difficile is involved in cell adherence.
Hennequin, C., Collignon, A., Bourlioux, P., Waligora-Dupriet, A.-J., Karjalainen, T., Barc, M.-C., & Porcheray, F. (2001) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-147-1-87 · Cited by 226
Boch, J., Kempf, B., Schmid, R., & Bremer, E. (1996) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.178.17.5121-5129.1996 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Hecker, M., Schumann, W., & Völker, U.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417-428
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2081373054
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heat‐shock and general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.396932.x
- The paper
- Hecker, M., Schumann, W., & Völker, U. (1996). Heat‐shock and general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.396932.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.