Cited by 95RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyRNA modifications and cancer

Three, four or more: the translational stop signal at length

Tate, Warren P., Mannering, Sally A.·1996·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Translational stop signals are defined in the genetic code as UAA, UAG and UGA, although the mechanism of their decoding via protein factors is clearly different from that of the other codons. There are strong biases in the upstream and downstream nucleotides surrounding stop codons. Experimental tests have shown that termination‐signal strength is strongly influenced by the identity of the nucleotide immediately downstream of the codon (+4), with a correlation between the strength of this four‐base signal and its occurrence at termination sites. The +4 nucleotide and other biases downstream of the stop codon may reflect sites of contact between the release factor and the mRNA, whereas upstream biases may be due to coding restrictions, with the release factor perhaps recognizing the final tRNA and the last two amino acids of the polypeptide undergoing synthesis. This means that the translational stop signal is probably larger than the triplet codon, but its exact length will be clearer when it is known which nucleotides are in direct contact with the release factor. Ultimately it will be defined exactly when a crystal structure of the release factor with its recognition substrate becomes available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.6391352.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The translation termination signal is more than a stop codon, including the downstream +4 site (tetranucleotide stop signal).

    “It has long been recognized that the translation termination signal is more than a stop codon [86,87], leading to an early proposal of tetranucleotide stop signal including the downstream +4 site [63,65,87,88].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tate, W. P., & Mannering, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Tate, Warren P.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-07
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
213-219
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W1974262889
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
stop codon, release factors, codon usage bias, protein factors, genetic code
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Peptide Chain Termination, Translational, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Messenger, Suppression, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Codon, Terminator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review