The yeast transcriptome in aerobic and hypoxic conditions: effects of hap1, rox1, rox3 and srb10 deletions
Abstract
The transcriptome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was screened using the high-density membrane hybridization method, under aerobic and hypoxic conditions, in wild-type and mutant backgrounds obtained by the disruption of the genes encoding the regulatory proteins Hap1, Rox1 and the Srb10 and Rox3 subunits of RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. None of the mutations studied was able to fully overcome the wild-type hypoxic response. Deletion of the hap1 gene changed the expression profiles of individual open reading frames (ORFs) under both aerobic and hypoxic conditions. Major changes associated with rox3 deletion were related to the hypoxic activation. Rox3 also caused a repressor effect (oxygen-independent) on a subset of genes related to subtelomeric proteins. With regard to the effect brought about by the deletion of rox1 and srb10, correspondence cluster analysis revealed that the transcriptome profile in aerobic conditions is very similar in the wild-type and both deletion strains. In contrast, however, differences were found during hypoxia between the subgroup formed by wild-type and the Deltarox1 deletant compared with the Deltasrb10 deletant. An analysis of selected ORFs responding to hypoxia, in association with a dependence on the regulatory factors studied, made it possible to identify the clusters that are related to different regulatory circuits.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several genome-wide expression studies under low oxygen conditions have reflected that the pattern of expression differs among ERG genes, although some general trends can be extracted.
“Several genome-wide expression studies based on microarray and RNA-Seq analyses under low oxygen conditions have reflected that the pattern of expression differs among ERG genes, although some general trends can be extracted [94,96,98,100,101,102,103].”
From Regulation of Ergosterol Biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Becerra, M., Lombardía‐Ferreira, L. J., Hauser, N. C., Hoheisel, J. D., Tizon, B., & Cerdán, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Universidade da Coruña (ES)
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 545-555
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2114022890
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universidade da Coruña
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae, hypoxia, transcriptome, HAP1, roX1, RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, gene expression regulation, transcriptional regulatory networks
- MeSH terms
- Aerobiosis, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fungal Proteins, Glucose, Mutation, Oxygen, Repressor Proteins, RNA Polymerase II, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Trans-Activators, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Deletion, Cyclin-Dependent Kinases, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 8, Mediator Complex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review