The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diversity in the serine recombinases
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Most site‐specific recombinases fall into one of two families, based on evolutionary and mechanistic relatedness. These are the tyrosine recombinases or λ integrase family and the serine recombinases or resolvase/invertase family. The tyrosine recombinases are structurally diverse and functionally versatile and include integrases, resolvases, invertases and transposases. Recent studies have revealed that the serine recombinase family is equally versatile and members have a variety of structural forms. The archetypal resolvase/invertases are highly regulated, only affect resolution or inversion and they have an N‐terminal catalytic domain and a C‐terminal DNA binding domain. Phage‐encoded serine recombinases (e.g.φ C31 integrase) cause integration and excision with strictly controlled directionality, and have an N‐terminal catalytic domain but much longer C‐terminal domains compared with the resolvase/invertases. This high molecular weight group also contains transposases (e.g. TnpX from Tn 4451). Other transposases, which belong to a third structurally different group, are similar in size to the resolvase/invertases but have the DNA binding domain N‐terminal to the catalytic domain (e.g. IS 607 transposase). These three structural groups represented by the resolvase/invertases, the large serine recombinases and relatives of IS 607 transposase correlate with three major groupings seen in a phylogeny of the catalytic domains. These observations indicate that the serine recombinases are modular and that fusion of the catalytic domain to unrelated sequences has generated structural and functional diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in Mammalian cell line development technologies for recombinant protein production
Lai, T., Yang, Y., & Ng, S. (2013) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph6050579 · Cited by 322
Permanent genetic memory with >1-byte capacity
Yang, L., Nielsen, A. A. K., Fernandez-Rodriguez, J., McClune, C. J., Laub, M. T., Lu, T. K., & Voigt, C. A. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3147 · Cited by 243
Current issues in mouse genome engineering
Glaser, S., Anastassiadis, K., & Stewart, A. F. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1668 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, M. C. M., & Thorpe, H. M.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 299-307
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2096167173
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity in the serine recombinases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02891.x
- The paper
- Smith, M. C. M., & Thorpe, H. M. (2002). Diversity in the serine recombinases. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02891.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.