Cited by 729Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyMycobacterium research and diagnosisPoxvirus research and outbreaks

Loss of RD1 contributed to the attenuation of the live tuberculosis vaccines Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Mycobacterium microti

Open access
Pym, Alexander S., Brodin, Priscille, Brosch, Roland, Huerre, Michel, Cole, Stewart T.·2002·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Although large human populations have been safely immunized against tuberculosis with two live vaccines, Mycobacterium bovis BCG or Mycobacterium microti , the vole bacillus, the molecular basis for the avirulence of these vaccine strains remains unknown. Comparative genomics has identified a series of chromosomal deletions common to both virulent and avirulent species but only a single locus, RD1, that has been deleted from M. bovis BCG and M. microti . Restoration of RD1, by gene knock‐in, resulted in a marked change in colonial morphology towards that of virulent tubercle bacilli. Three RD1‐encoded proteins were localized in the cell wall, and two of them, the immunodominant T‐cell antigens ESAT‐6 and CFP‐10, were also found in culture supernatants. The BCG::RD1 and M. microti ::RD1 knock‐ins grew more vigorously than controls in immunodeficient mice, inducing extensive splenomegaly and granuloma formation. Increased persistence and partial reversal of attenuation were observed when immunocompetent mice were infected with the BCG::RD1 knock‐in, whereas BCG controls were cleared. Knocking‐in five other RD loci did not affect the virulence of BCG. This study describes a genetic lesion that contributes to safety and opens new avenues for vaccine development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03237.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 729

Authors
Pym, A. S., Brodin, P., Brosch, R., Huerre, M., & Cole, S. T.
Affiliations
Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Cole, Stewart T.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10-31
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
709-717
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W1920434477
Cited by
729
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 28
FWCI
18.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Keywords
Mycobacterium bovis BCG, Mycobacterium microti, vaccine attenuation, chromosomal deletion, ESAT-6, CFP-10, bacterial virulence, immunodeficient mice, granuloma formation, splenomegaly, bacterial persistence, vaccine safety
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Bacterial, Bacterial Proteins, BCG Vaccine, Cattle, Arvicolinae, Female, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mycobacterium, Mycobacterium bovis, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Vaccines, Attenuated, Virulence, Mice, SCID, Gene Deletion, Tuberculosis Vaccines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review