The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SarA and not σB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation is associated with the production of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA/PNAG), the product of the ica operon. The staphylococcal accessory regulator, SarA, is a central regulatory element that controls the production of S. aureus virulence factors. By screening a library of Tn917 insertions in a clinical S. aureus strain, we identified SarA as being essential for biofilm development. Non‐polar mutations of sar A in four genetically unrelated S. aureus strains decreased PIA/PNAG production and completely impaired biofilm development, both in steady state and flow conditions via an agr‐independent mechanism. Accordingly, real‐time PCR showed that the mutation in the sar A gene resulted in downregulation of the ica operon transcription. We also demonstrated that complete deletion of σ B did not affect PIA/PNAG production and biofilm formation, although it slightly decreased ica operon transcription. Furthermore, the sar A‐σ B double mutant showed a significant decrease of ica expression but an increase of PIA/PNAG production and biofilm formation compared to the sar A single mutant. We propose that SarA activates S. aureus development of biofilm by both enhancing the ica operon transcription and suppressing the transcription of either a protein involved in the turnover of PIA/PNAG or a repressor of its synthesis, whose expression would be σ B‐dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Cited by
Arciola, C. R., Campoccia, D., Speziale, P., Montanaro, L., & Costerton, J. W. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.031 · Cited by 1,047
Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: Properties, regulation, and roles in human disease
Archer, N. K., Mazaitis, M. J., Costerton, J. W., Leid, J. G., Powers, M. E., & Shirtliff, M. E. (2011) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 · Cited by 1,018
Flagellar Motility Is Critical for Listeria monocytogenes Biofilm Formation
Lemon, K. P., Higgins, D. E., & Kolter, R. (2007) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.01967-06 · Cited by 462
Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus
McCarthy, H., Rudkin, J. K., Black, N. S., Gallagher, L., O'Neill, E., & O'Gara, J. P. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00001 · Cited by 426
Pozzi, C., Waters, E. M., Rudkin, J. K., Schaeffer, C. R., Lohan, A. J., Tong, P., Loftus, B. J., Pier, G. B., Fey, P. D., Massey, R. C., et al. (2012) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002626 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Valle, J., Toledo‐Arana, A., Berasain, C., Ghigo, J., Amorena, B., Penadés, J. R., & Lasa, I.
- Venue
- Molecular Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1075-1087
- ISSN
- 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2958
- OpenAlex
- W2121897239
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SarA and not σB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03493.x
- The paper
- Valle, J., Toledo‐Arana, A., Berasain, C., Ghigo, J., Amorena, B., Penadés, J. R., & Lasa, I. (2003). SarA and not σB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03493.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.