Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 442

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SarA and not σB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Valle, Jaione, Toledo‐Arana, Alejandro, Berasain, Carmen, Ghigo, Jean‐Marc, Amorena, Beatriz, Penadés, José R., Lasa, Iñigo·2003·Molecular Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation is associated with the production of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA/PNAG), the product of the ica operon. The staphylococcal accessory regulator, SarA, is a central regulatory element that controls the production of S. aureus virulence factors. By screening a library of Tn917 insertions in a clinical S. aureus strain, we identified SarA as being essential for biofilm development. Non‐polar mutations of sar A in four genetically unrelated S. aureus strains decreased PIA/PNAG production and completely impaired biofilm development, both in steady state and flow conditions via an agr‐independent mechanism. Accordingly, real‐time PCR showed that the mutation in the sar A gene resulted in downregulation of the ica operon transcription. We also demonstrated that complete deletion of σ B did not affect PIA/PNAG production and biofilm formation, although it slightly decreased ica operon transcription. Furthermore, the sar A‐σ B double mutant showed a significant decrease of ica expression but an increase of PIA/PNAG production and biofilm formation compared to the sar A single mutant. We propose that SarA activates S. aureus development of biofilm by both enhancing the ica operon transcription and suppressing the transcription of either a protein involved in the turnover of PIA/PNAG or a repressor of its synthesis, whose expression would be σ B‐dependent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03493.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 442

Metadata

Authors
Valle, J., Toledo‐Arana, A., Berasain, C., Ghigo, J., Amorena, B., Penadés, J. R., & Lasa, I.
Venue
Molecular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1075-1087
ISSN
  • 0950-382X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2958
OpenAlex
W2121897239
Cited by
442
References
1
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SarA and not σB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03493.x
The paper
Valle, J., Toledo‐Arana, A., Berasain, C., Ghigo, J., Amorena, B., Penadés, J. R., & Lasa, I. (2003). SarA and not σB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. Molecular Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03493.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.