Cited by 156Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

APOE ɛ4 influences the pathological phenotype of Alzheimer's disease by favouring cerebrovascular over parenchymal accumulation of Aβ protein

Open access
Chalmers, K., Wilcock, G. K., Love, S.·2003·Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

Abstract

The relative amounts of amyloid beta-protein (A beta) in cerebral blood vessels and parenchyma vary considerably amongst patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this variability, the underlying genetic and environmental determinants are still unclear, as are the functional consequences. Polymorphisms in APOE, the gene for apolipoprotein E (ApoE), influence the risk of developing AD and of deposition of A beta within the brain. We examined the relationship between the APOE genotype and the relative extent of accumulation of A beta as plaques within the cerebral parenchyma and in cortical blood vessels in the form of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), in autopsy brain tissue from 125 AD cases and from 53 elderly, neurologically normal controls of which 19 had CAA without other neuropathological features of AD. In the AD cases, we also assessed whether the severity of CAA was related to the age of onset and duration of dementia, risk factors for atherosclerotic vascular disease, and histologically demonstrable cerebral infarcts or foci of haemorrhage. The APOE genotype was determined by a standard polymerase chain reaction-based method. Paraffin sections of frontal, temporal and parietal lobes were immunolabelled for A beta and the parenchymal A beta load (total A beta minus vessel-associated A beta) was quantified by computer-assisted image analysis. CAA severity was scored for cortical and leptomeningeal vessels. The re…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00457.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 156

Authors
Chalmers, K., Wilcock, G. K., & Love, S.
Affiliations
Frenchay Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Love, S.
Venue
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-27
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
231-238
ISSN
  • 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2990
OpenAlex
W2096898082
Cited by
156
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, apolipoprotein E, amyloid-beta, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, cerebral vasculature, amyloid plaques, APOE genotype, age of onset, cerebral infarction, hemorrhage, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Blood Vessels, Brain, Female, Genotype, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Time Factors, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Age of Onset, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review