The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis
Abstract
Infants with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) born from 1983 to 1988 and recorded in the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program (CBDMP) database were compared with their birth cohort by demographic characteristics and selected associated birth defects. We identified 1963 cases of IHPS for a cumulative incidence of 1.9 per 1000 livebirths. The cumulative incidence per 1000 livebirths was 2.4 in White, 1.8 in Hispanic, 0.7 in Black, and 0.6 in Asian infants. Between weeks 3–12 after birth, 1871 (95%) IHPS cases were diagnosed. Premature infants were diagnosed with IHPS later than term or post‐term infants. The incidence of IHPS declined for those born to maternal age groups of 25 years and, independently, for successive birth ranks. The probandwise concordance rate for IHPS in monozygous twins was less than unity (0.25–0.44), although higher than the concordance for dizygous twins (0.05–0.10). The incidence of Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome (SLO) diagnosed in infants with IHPS (3 of 1963) was 157‐fold higher than the incidence of SLO diagnosed in the CBDMP population.IHPS occurs in all of the largest racial and ethnic groups in California, most frequently in White and Hispanic infants. Pyloric stenosis presents only within a brief phase of development, which may be delayed in premature infants. A predominant discordance of disease state in monozygous twins implies an aetiological role for undetermined environmental factors. The association between SLO, caused by deficient cholesterol synthesis, and IHPS deserves additional study. Infants with suspected SLO require close observation for the onset of IHPS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome
Kelley, R. I., & Hennekam, R. C. M. (2000) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.37.5.321 · Cited by 480
The 11q terminal deletion disorder: A prospective study of 110 cases
Grossfeld, P. D., Mattina, T., Lai, Z., Favier, R., Jones, K. L., Cotter, F., Jones, C., & the 11q Consortium (2004) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30090 · Cited by 347
Anomalies in Down syndrome individuals in a large population-based registry
Torfs, C. P., & Christianson, R. E. (1998) · American Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19980605)77:5<431::aid-ajmg15>3.0.co;2-j · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schechter, R., Torfs, C. P., & Bateson, T. F.
- Venue
- Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-427
- ISSN
- 0269-5022 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3016
- OpenAlex
- W1979996599
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3016.1997.d01-32.x
- The paper
- Schechter, R., Torfs, C. P., & Bateson, T. F. (1997). The epidemiology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3016.1997.d01-32.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.