The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acclimation of photosynthesis to irradiance and spectral quality in British plant species: chlorophyll content, photosynthetic capacity and habitat preference
Abstract
Twenty‐two common British angiosperms were examined for their ability to acclimate photosynthetically to sun and shade conditions. Plants were grown under low irradiance, far‐red enriched light (50 μmol m−2 s−1), selected to mimic as closely as possible natural canopy shade, and moderately high light of insufficient irradiance to induce photoinhibitory or photoprotective responses (300 μmol m−2 s−1). Light‐and CO 2‐saturated photosynthetic rates of oxygen evolution (Pmax) and chlorophyll content were measured. Large variation was found in both parameters, and two ‘strategies’ for long‐term acclimation were identified: firstly a change in chlorophyll per unit leaf area which was found to correlate positively with photosynthetic capacity, and secondly changes in chlorophyll alb ratio and Pmax, indicative of alterations at the chloroplast level, which were not associated with a change in chlorophyll content per unit leaf area. Combinations of these two strategies may occur, giving rise to the observed diversity in photosynthetic acclimation. The extent and nature of photosynthetic acclimation were compared with an index of shade association, calculated from the association each species has with woodland. It was found that the greatest flexibility for change at the chloroplast level was found in those species possessing an intermediate shade association, whilst acclimation in ‘sun’ species proceeded by a change in chlorophyll content; obligate shade species showed little capacity for acclimation at either the chloroplast or leaf level. A framework for explaining the variation between plant species in leaf‐level photosynthetic capacity, in relation to the natural light environment, is presented. This is the first time the potential for light acclimation of photosynthesis in different plant species has been satisfactorily linked to habitat distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants
Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826
Cited by
Kosová, K., Vítámvás, P., Prášil, I. T., & Renaut, J. (2011) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2011.02.006 · Cited by 852
Towards an understanding of photosynthetic acclimation
Walters, R. G. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri060 · Cited by 630
Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area
Poorter, H., & Evans, J. R. (1998) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s004420050560 · Cited by 587
Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community
STUBBS, W. J., & BASTOW WILSON, J. (2004) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00898.x · Cited by 447
Importance of Fluctuations in Light on Plant Photosynthetic Acclimation
Vialet-Chabrand, S., Matthews, J. S. A., Simkin, A. J., Raines, C. A., & Lawson, T. (2017) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.01767 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- MURCHIE, E. H., & HORTON, P.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 438-448
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W1991567280
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acclimation of photosynthesis to irradiance and spectral quality in British plant species: chlorophyll content, photosynthetic capacity and habitat preference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-95.x
- The paper
- MURCHIE, E. H., & HORTON, P. (1997). Acclimation of photosynthesis to irradiance and spectral quality in British plant species: chlorophyll content, photosynthetic capacity and habitat preference. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-95.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.