Cited by 227Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsLeaf Properties and Growth MeasurementLight effects on plants

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence

Vogelmann, T. C., Evans, J. R.·2002·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Abstract Chlorophyll fluorescence was used to estimate profiles of absorbed light within chlorophyll solutions and leaves. For chlorophyll solutions, the intensity of the emitted fluorescence declined in a log–linear manner with the distance from the irradiated surface as predicted by Beer's law. The amount of fluorescence was proportional to chlorophyll concentration for chlorophyll solutions given epi‐illumination on a microscope slide. These relationships appeared to hold for more optically complex spinach leaves. The profile of chlorophyll fluorescence emitted by leaf cross sections given epi‐illumination corresponded to chlorophyll content measured in extracts of leaf paradermal sections. Thus epifluorescence was used to estimate relative chlorophyll content through leaf tissues. Fluorescence profiles across leaves depended on wavelength and orientation, reaching a peak at 50–70 µm depth. By infiltrating leaves with water, the pathlengthening due to scattering at the airspace : cell wall interfaces was calculated. Surprisingly, the palisade and spongy mesophyll had similar values for pathlengthening with the value being greatest for green light (550 > 650 > 450 nm). By combining fluorescence profiles with chlorophyll distribution across the leaf, the profile of the apparent extinction coefficient was calculated. The light profiles within spinach leaves could be well approximated by an apparent extinction coefficient and the Beer–Lambert/Bouguer laws. Light was absorbed at greater depths than predicted from fibre optic measurements, with 50% of blue and green light reaching 125 and 240 µm deep, respectively.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00910.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts.

    “In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts (Vogelmann and Evans, 2002; Evans and Vogelmann, 2003; Slattery et al., 2016).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01519.x · DOI
  2. 10.1071/PP9950865 · DOI
  3. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00440.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0005-2728(87)90249-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1104/pp.110.2.339 · DOI
  6. 10.1071/PP9940475 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90163-G · DOI
  8. 10.1093/jxb/34.12.1676 · DOI
  9. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00558.x · DOI
  10. 10.1006/anbo.1998.0589 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00492.x · DOI
  12. Nishio J., 1993, Gradients of carbon fixation do not follow light gradients within leaves, Plant Cell, 5, 953, 10.2307/3869663 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04244.x · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0 · DOI
  15. Von Remisowsky A.M., 1992, A comparative study of internal light environment in bifacial leaves of different plants, Botanica Acta, 105, 343
  16. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb08534.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03077.x · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03078.x · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1998.tb09691.x · DOI
  20. 10.1364/AO.22.001402 · DOI
  21. 10.2307/1313100 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00004.x · DOI
  23. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029298 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00271.x · DOI
  25. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076672 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087034 · DOI
  27. 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00762.x · DOI
  28. 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.001311 · DOI
  29. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00649.x · DOI
  30. 10.1098/rstb.1989.0020 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09173.x · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S1360-1385(96)80031-8 · DOI
  33. 10.1104/pp.47.5.656 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vogelmann, T. C., & Evans, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Vogelmann, T. C.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09-19
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1313-1323
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2019318222
Cited by
227
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Cell & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Division of Biological Infrastructure
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
Keywords
chlorophyll fluorescence, spinach leaves, Beer-Lambert law, light scattering, mesophyll, chlorophyll distribution, leaf optical properties, epifluorescence, leaf cross section

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review