The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Profiles of light absorption and chlorophyll within spinach leaves from chlorophyll fluorescence
Abstract
Abstract Chlorophyll fluorescence was used to estimate profiles of absorbed light within chlorophyll solutions and leaves. For chlorophyll solutions, the intensity of the emitted fluorescence declined in a log–linear manner with the distance from the irradiated surface as predicted by Beer's law. The amount of fluorescence was proportional to chlorophyll concentration for chlorophyll solutions given epi‐illumination on a microscope slide. These relationships appeared to hold for more optically complex spinach leaves. The profile of chlorophyll fluorescence emitted by leaf cross sections given epi‐illumination corresponded to chlorophyll content measured in extracts of leaf paradermal sections. Thus epifluorescence was used to estimate relative chlorophyll content through leaf tissues. Fluorescence profiles across leaves depended on wavelength and orientation, reaching a peak at 50–70 µm depth. By infiltrating leaves with water, the pathlengthening due to scattering at the airspace : cell wall interfaces was calculated. Surprisingly, the palisade and spongy mesophyll had similar values for pathlengthening with the value being greatest for green light (550 > 650 > 450 nm). By combining fluorescence profiles with chlorophyll distribution across the leaf, the profile of the apparent extinction coefficient was calculated. The light profiles within spinach leaves could be well approximated by an apparent extinction coefficient and the Beer–Lambert/Bouguer laws. Light was absorbed at greater depths than predicted from fibre optic measurements, with 50% of blue and green light reaching 125 and 240 µm deep, respectively.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts.
“In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts (Vogelmann and Evans, 2002; Evans and Vogelmann, 2003; Slattery et al., 2016).”
From Photosynthesis, Light Use Efficiency, and Yield of Reduced-Chlorophyll Soybean Mutants in Field Conditions (2017) · cites this paper as Vogelmann and Evans, 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01519.x · DOI
- 10.1071/PP9950865 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00440.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0005-2728(87)90249-0 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.110.2.339 · DOI
- 10.1071/PP9940475 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90163-G · DOI
- 10.1093/jxb/34.12.1676 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00558.x · DOI
- 10.1006/anbo.1998.0589 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00492.x · DOI
- Nishio J., 1993, Gradients of carbon fixation do not follow light gradients within leaves, Plant Cell, 5, 953, 10.2307/3869663 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04244.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0 · DOI
- Von Remisowsky A.M., 1992, A comparative study of internal light environment in bifacial leaves of different plants, Botanica Acta, 105, 343
- 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb08534.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03077.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb03078.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1998.tb09691.x · DOI
- 10.1364/AO.22.001402 · DOI
- 10.2307/1313100 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00004.x · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029298 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00271.x · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076672 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087034 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00762.x · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.001311 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00649.x · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1989.0020 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09173.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S1360-1385(96)80031-8 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.47.5.656 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, J., & van Iersel, M. W. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.619987 · Cited by 343
Slattery, R. A., VanLoocke, A., Bernacchi, C. J., Zhu, X.-G., & Ort, D. R. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00549 · Cited by 153
“In dark-green leaves, the majority of light absorption occurs in the uppermost adaxial chloroplasts, causing light limitation in lower chloroplasts (Vogelmann and Evans, 2002; Evans and Vogelmann, 2003; Slattery et al., 2016).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogelmann, T. C., & Evans, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Vogelmann, T. C.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-19
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1313-1323
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2019318222
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plant Cell & Environment (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Biological Infrastructure
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Keywords
- chlorophyll fluorescence, spinach leaves, Beer-Lambert law, light scattering, mesophyll, chlorophyll distribution, leaf optical properties, epifluorescence, leaf cross section
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review