The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is there an optimal root architecture for nitrate capture in leaching environments?
Open accessAbstract
Little is known about root architectural attributes that aid the capture of nitrate from coarse‐textured soil profiles of high leaching potential. In this study, a range of root architectures from the herringbone to the dichotomous structure were simulated, and their capacity to take up nitrate leaching through a sandy profile was recorded. All root systems had equal total volume at each point in time, and so were considered cost equivalent. These simulations showed that the root architecture likely to maximize nitrate capture from sandy soils (under the Mediterranean rainfall pattern experienced in Western Australia) is one that quickly produces a high density of roots in the top‐soil early in the season, thereby reducing total nitrate leached with opening season rains, but also has vigorous taproot growth, enabling access to deep‐stored water and leached nitrate later in the season. This is the first published, spatially explicit attempt to assess the ability of different root architectures equivalent in cost, to capture nitrate from a spatially and temporally heterogeneous soil environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Grain Legume Production and Use in European Agricultural Systems
Watson, C. A., Reckling, M., Preissel, S., Bachinger, J., Bergkvist, G., Kuhlman, T., Lindström, K., Nemecek, T., Topp, C. F. E., Vanhatalo, A., et al. (2017) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2017.03.003 · Cited by 328
Biochar amendment increases maize root surface areas and branching: a shovelomics study in Zambia
Abiven, S., Hund, A., Martinsen, V., & Cornelissen, G. (2015) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2533-2 · Cited by 198
Root-restricting layers in German agricultural soils. Part I: extent and cause
Schneider, F., & Don, A. (2019) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-019-04185-9 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- DUNBABIN, V., DIGGLE, A., & RENGEL, Z.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 835-844
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2129572606
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is there an optimal root architecture for nitrate capture in leaching environments? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01015.x
- The paper
- DUNBABIN, V., DIGGLE, A., & RENGEL, Z. (2003). Is there an optimal root architecture for nitrate capture in leaching environments? Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01015.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.