The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign Rubisco increase productivity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis
Abstract
Genetic modification of Rubisco to increase the specificity for CO 2 relative to O 2 (τ) would decrease photorespiration and in principle should increase crop productivity. When the kinetic properties of Rubisco from different photosynthetic organisms are compared, it appears that forms with high τ have low maximum catalytic rates of carboxylation per active site (kcc). If it is assumed that an inverse relationship between kcc and τ exists, as implied from measurements, and that an increased concentration of Rubisco per unit leaf area is not possible, will increasing τ result in increased leaf and canopy photosynthesis? A steady‐state biochemical model for leaf photosynthesis was coupled to a canopy biophysical microclimate model and used to explore this question. C 3 photosynthetic CO 2 uptake rate (A) is either limited by the maximum rate of Rubisco activity (Vcmax) or by the rate of regeneration of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate, in turn determined by the rate of whole chain electron transport (J). Thus, if J is limiting, an increase in τ will increase net CO 2 uptake because more products of the electron transport chain will be partitioned away from photorespiration into photosynthesis. The effect of an increase in τ on Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis depends on both kcc and the concentration of CO 2 ([CO 2]). Assuming a strict inverse relationship between kcc and τ, the simulations showed that a decrease, not an increase, in τ increases Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis at the current atmospheric [CO 2], but the increase is observed only in high light. In crop canopies, significant amounts of both light‐limited and light‐saturated photosynthesis contribute to total crop carbon gain. For canopies, the present average τ found in C 3 terrestrial plants is supra‐optimal for the present atmospheric [CO 2] of 370 µ mol mol−1, but would be optimal for a CO 2 concentration of around 200 µ mol mol−1, a value close to the average of the last 400 000 years. Replacing the average Rubisco of terrestrial C 3 plants with one having a lower and optimal τ would increase canopy carbon gain by 3%. Because there are significant deviations from the strict inverse relationship between kcc and τ, the canopy model was also used to compare the rates of canopy photosynthesis for several Rubiscos with well‐defined kinetic constants. These simulations suggest that very substantial increases (> 25%) in crop carbon gain could result if specific Rubiscos having either a higher τ or higher kcc were successfully expressed in C 3 plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Cited by
Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.
Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112206 · Cited by 1,902
Self-citationElevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE
Leakey, A. D. B., Ainsworth, E. A., Bernacchi, C. J., Rogers, A., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erp096 · Cited by 1,678
Self-citationComparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement
Blankenship, R. E., Tiede, D. M., Barber, J., Brudvig, G. W., Fleming, G., Ghirardi, M., Gunner, M. R., Junge, W., Kramer, D. M., Melis, A., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200165 · Cited by 1,638
Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?
LONG, S. P., ZHU, X., NAIDU, S. L., & ORT, D. R. (2006) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01493.x · Cited by 1,586
Self-citationWhat is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass?
Zhu, X.-G., Long, S. P., & Ort, D. R. (2008) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.004 · Cited by 1,145
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ZHU, X. ‐., PORTIS, A. R., & LONG, S. P.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-165
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2148815915
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign Rubisco increase productivity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2004.01142.x
- The paper
- ZHU, X. ‐., PORTIS, A. R., & LONG, S. P. (2004). Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign Rubisco increase productivity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2004.01142.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.