Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mutations at two new Arabidopsis ABA response loci are similar to the abi3 mutations

Finkelstein, Ruth R.·1994·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Two new Arabidopsis loci involved in ABA response, ABA‐i nsensitive (ABI)4 and ABI5, have been identified by mutation. The abi4 and abi5 mutants were characterized in terms of ABA sensitivity of seed germination, dormancy, seed‐specific gene expression and stomatal regulation. Their phenotypes are similar to mutations in ABI3, which is thought to encode a seed‐specific transcriptional activator. Analysis of double mutants combining abi4 and abi5 mutations with abi1, abi2 or a bi3 mutations also suggests that ABI4 and ABI5 act in the same transduction pathway as ABI3.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1994.5060765.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Finkelstein, R. R.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
765-771
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2091705630
Cited by
429
References
0
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutations at two new Arabidopsis ABA response loci are similar to the abi3 mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1994.5060765.x
The paper
Finkelstein, R. R. (1994). Mutations at two new Arabidopsis ABA response loci are similar to the abi3 mutations. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1994.5060765.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.