The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Site‐specific integration of DNA into wild‐type and mutant lox sites placed in the plant genome
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The bacteriophage P1 Cre—lox site‐specific recombination system has been used to integrate DNA specifically at lox sites previously placed in the tobacco genome. As integrated molecules flanked by wild‐type lox sites can readily excise in the presence of Cre recombinase, screening for mutant lox sites that can resist excisional recombination was performed. In gene integration experiments, wild‐type and mutant lox sites were used in conjunction with two strategies for abolishing post‐integration Cre activity: (i) promoter displacement of a cre‐expression construct present in the target genome; and (ii) transient expression of cre. When the promoter displacement strategy was used, integrant plants were recovered after transformation with constructs containing mutant lox sequences, but not with constructs containing wild‐type lox sites. When cre was transiently expressed, integrant plants were obtained after transformation with either mutant or wild‐type lox sites. DNA rearrangements at the target locus were less frequent when mutant lox sites were used. DNA integration at the genomic lox site was usually without additional insertions in the genome. Thus, the Cre—lox site‐specific recombination system is useful for the single‐copy integration of DNA into a chromosomal lox site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agrobacterium -Mediated Plant Transformation: the Biology behind the “Gene-Jockeying” Tool
Gelvin, S. B. (2003) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.67.1.16-37.2003 · Cited by 1,379
Cre-dependent selection yields AAV variants for widespread gene transfer to the adult brain
Deverman, B. E., Pravdo, P. L., Simpson, B. P., Kumar, S. R., Chan, K. Y., Banerjee, A., Wu, W.-L., Yang, B., Huber, N., Pasca, S. P., et al. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3440 · Cited by 1,061
Capture of genomic and T-DNA sequences during double-strand break repair in somatic plant cells
Salomon, S. (1998) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/17.20.6086 · Cited by 355
Current issues in mouse genome engineering
Glaser, S., Anastassiadis, K., & Stewart, A. F. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1668 · Cited by 160
Ojala, D. S., Sun, S., Santiago-Ortiz, J. L., Shapiro, M. G., Romero, P. A., & Schaffer, D. V. (2018) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.09.006 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Albert, H., Dale, E. C., Lee, E., & Ow, D. W.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 649-659
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W1983188063
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Site‐specific integration of DNA into wild‐type and mutant lox sites placed in the plant genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.7040649.x
- The paper
- Albert, H., Dale, E. C., Lee, E., & Ow, D. W. (1995). Site‐specific integration of DNA into wild‐type and mutant lox sites placed in the plant genome. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1995.7040649.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.