The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation of defense gene induction defects with powdery mildew susceptibility inArabidopsisenhanced disease susceptibility mutants
Abstract
Summary: We investigated the relative importance of specific Arabidopsis thaliana genes in conferring resistance to bacterial versus fungal pathogens. We first developed a pathosystem involving the infection of Arabidopsis accession Columbia with a virulent isolate of the obligate biotrophic fungal pathogen Erysiphe orontii. E. orontii elicited the accumulation of mRNAs corresponding to the defense‐related genes PR1, BGL2 (PR2), PR5 and GST1 , but did not elicit production of the phytoalexin camalexin or the accumulation of defensin ( PDF1.2 ) or thionin ( THI2.1 ) mRNAs. We tested a set of 15 previously isolated Arabidopsis phytoalexin deficient (pad), non‐expresser of PR (npr) and enhanced disease susceptibility (eds) mutants that are more susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae for their susceptibility to E. orontii. Four of these mutants ( pad4–1, npr1–1, eds5–1 and a double npr1–1 eds5–1 mutant) as well as Arabidopsis lines carrying a nahG transgene exhibited enhanced susceptibility to E. orontii and reduced levels of PR gene expression . Comparison of the PR gene induction patterns in response to E. orontii in the various mutants and in the nahG transgenics suggests the existence of NPR1 ‐independent salicylate‐dependent and NPR1 ‐independent salicylate‐independent defense gene activation pathways. Eleven other eds and pad mutants did not show measurable enhanced susceptibility to E. orontii , suggesting that these mutants are defective in factors that are not important for the limitation of E. orontii growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence
Wildermuth, M. C., Dewdney, J., Wu, G., & Ausubel, F. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35107108 · Cited by 2,357
Self-citationCross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense
Kunkel, B. N., & Brooks, D. M. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00275-3 · Cited by 1,451
Arabidopsis WRKY33 transcription factor is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens
Zheng, Z., Qamar, S. A., Chen, Z., & Mengiste, T. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02901.x · Cited by 988
Nawrath, C., & Métraux, J.-P. (1999) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.11.8.1393 · Cited by 834
Silverleaf Whitefly Induces Salicylic Acid Defenses and Suppresses Effectual Jasmonic Acid Defenses
Zarate, S. I., Kempema, L. A., & Walling, L. L. (2007) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.090035 · Cited by 744
Metadata
- Authors
- Reuber, T. L., Plotnikova, J. M., Dewdney, J., Rogers, E. E., Wood, W., & Ausubel, F. M.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 473-485
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2097736893
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation of defense gene induction defects with powdery mildew susceptibility inArabidopsisenhanced disease susceptibility mutants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00319.x
- The paper
- Reuber, T. L., Plotnikova, J. M., Dewdney, J., Rogers, E. E., Wood, W., & Ausubel, F. M. (1998). Correlation of defense gene induction defects with powdery mildew susceptibility inArabidopsisenhanced disease susceptibility mutants. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00319.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.