Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 231

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Correlation of defense gene induction defects with powdery mildew susceptibility inArabidopsisenhanced disease susceptibility mutants

Reuber, T. Lynne, Plotnikova, Julia M., Dewdney, Julia, Rogers, Elizabeth E., Wood, William, Ausubel, Frederick M.·1998·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: We investigated the relative importance of specific Arabidopsis thaliana genes in conferring resistance to bacterial versus fungal pathogens. We first developed a pathosystem involving the infection of Arabidopsis accession Columbia with a virulent isolate of the obligate biotrophic fungal pathogen Erysiphe orontii. E. orontii elicited the accumulation of mRNAs corresponding to the defense‐related genes PR1, BGL2 (PR2), PR5 and GST1 , but did not elicit production of the phytoalexin camalexin or the accumulation of defensin ( PDF1.2 ) or thionin ( THI2.1 ) mRNAs. We tested a set of 15 previously isolated Arabidopsis phytoalexin deficient (pad), non‐expresser of PR (npr) and enhanced disease susceptibility (eds) mutants that are more susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae for their susceptibility to E. orontii. Four of these mutants ( pad4–1, npr1–1, eds5–1 and a double npr1–1 eds5–1 mutant) as well as Arabidopsis lines carrying a nahG transgene exhibited enhanced susceptibility to E. orontii and reduced levels of PR gene expression . Comparison of the PR gene induction patterns in response to E. orontii in the various mutants and in the nahG transgenics suggests the existence of NPR1 ‐independent salicylate‐dependent and NPR1 ‐independent salicylate‐independent defense gene activation pathways. Eleven other eds and pad mutants did not show measurable enhanced susceptibility to E. orontii , suggesting that these mutants are defective in factors that are not important for the limitation of E. orontii growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00319.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 231

Metadata

Authors
Reuber, T. L., Plotnikova, J. M., Dewdney, J., Rogers, E. E., Wood, W., & Ausubel, F. M.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-11
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
473-485
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2097736893
Cited by
231
References
0
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation of defense gene induction defects with powdery mildew susceptibility inArabidopsisenhanced disease susceptibility mutants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00319.x
The paper
Reuber, T. L., Plotnikova, J. M., Dewdney, J., Rogers, E. E., Wood, W., & Ausubel, F. M. (1998). Correlation of defense gene induction defects with powdery mildew susceptibility inArabidopsisenhanced disease susceptibility mutants. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00319.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.