The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A minor form of starch branching enzyme in potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers has a major effect on starch structure: cloning and characterisation of multiple forms of SBE A
Abstract
Summary: Full length cDNAs encoding a second starch branching enzyme (SBE A) isoform have been isolated from potato tubers. The predicted protein has a molecular mass of 101 kDa including a transit peptide of 48 amino acids. Multiple forms of the SBE A gene exist which differ mainly in the length of a polyglutamic acid repeat at the C‐terminus of the protein. Expression of the mature protein in Escherichia coli demonstrates that the gene encodes an active SBE. Northern analysis demonstrates that SBE A mRNA is expressed at very low levels in tubers but is the predominant isoform in leaves. This expression pattern was confirmed by Western analysis using isoform specific polyclonal antibodies raised against E. coli expressed SBE A. SBE A protein is found predominantly in the soluble phase of tuber extracts, indicating a stromal location within the plastid. Transgenic potato plants expressing an antisense SBE A RNA were generated in which almost complete reductions in SBE A were observed. SBE activity in the leaves of these plants was severely reduced, but tuber activity was largely unaffected. Even so, the composition and structure of tuber starch from these plants was greatly altered. The proportion of linear chains was not significantly increased but the average chain length of amylopectin was greater, resulting in an increase in apparent amylose content as judged by iodine binding. In addition, the starch had much higher levels of phosphorous.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants
Zeeman, S. C., Kossmann, J., & Smith, A. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112301 · Cited by 1,095
Resistant Starch: Promise for Improving Human Health
Birt, D. F., Boylston, T., Hendrich, S., Jane, J.-L., Hollis, J., Li, L., McClelland, J., Moore, S., Phillips, G. J., Rowling, M., et al. (2013) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.113.004325 · Cited by 852
The diurnal metabolism of leaf starch
Zeeman, S. C., Smith, S. M., & Smith, A. M. (2007) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20061393 · Cited by 443
Formation of starch in plant cells
Pfister, B., & Zeeman, S. C. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2250-x · Cited by 423
Tetlow, I. J., Wait, R., Lu, Z., Akkasaeng, R., Bowsher, C. G., Esposito, S., Kosar-Hashemi, B., Morell, M. K., & Emes, M. J. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.017400 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Jobling, S. A., Schwall, G. P., Westcott, R. J., Sidebottom, C. M., Debet, M., Gidley, M. J., Jeffcoat, R., & Safford, R.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-171
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W1980625202
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A minor form of starch branching enzyme in potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers has a major effect on starch structure: cloning and characterisation of multiple forms of SBE A. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00441.x
- The paper
- Jobling, S. A., Schwall, G. P., Westcott, R. J., Sidebottom, C. M., Debet, M., Gidley, M. J., Jeffcoat, R., & Safford, R. (1999). A minor form of starch branching enzyme in potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers has a major effect on starch structure: cloning and characterisation of multiple forms of SBE A. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00441.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.