The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deficiency in phytoalexin production causes enhanced susceptibility of Arabidopsis thaliana to the fungus Alternaria brassicicola
Abstract
Summary: The phytoalexin‐deficient Arabidopsis mutant pad3‐1, which is affected in the production of the indole‐type phytoalexin camalexin, has previously been shown not to display altered susceptibility to either the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae (Glazebrook & Ausubel 1994; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 8955–8959) or the biotrophic fungi Peronospora parasitica (Glazebrook et al. 1997; Genetics, 146: 381–392) and Erysiphe orontii (Reuber et al. 1998; Plant J. 16: 473–485). We now show that this mutant is markedly more susceptible than its wild‐type parental line to infection by the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola, but not to Botrytis cinerea. A strong camalexin response was elicited in wild‐type plants inoculated with either Alternaria brassicicola or Botrytis cinerea, whereas no camalexin could be detected in pad3‐1 challenged with these fungi. Hence, PAD3 appears to be a key determinant in resistance to at least A. brassicicola. The induction of salicylate‐dependent and jasmonate/ethylene‐dependent defense genes was not reduced in Alternaria‐challenged pad3‐1 plants compared to similarly treated wild‐type plants. Camalexin production could not be triggered by exogenous application of either salicylate, ethylene or jasmonate and was not, or not strongly, reduced in mutants with defects in perception of these defense‐related signal molecules. Camalexin‐production appears to be controlled by a pathway that exhibits little cross‐talk with salicylate‐, ethylene‐ and jasmonate‐dependent signalling events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PLANT-MEDIATED INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PATHOGENIC MICROORGANISMS AND HERBIVOROUS ARTHROPODS
Stout, M. J., Thaler, J. S., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2006) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151117 · Cited by 463
Self-citationProst, I., Dhondt, S., Rothe, G., Vicente, J., Rodriguez, M. J., Kift, N., Carbonne, F., Griffiths, G., Esquerré-Tugayé, M.-T., Rosahl, S., et al. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.066274 · Cited by 438
Non‐host resistance in plants: new insights into an old phenomenon
NÜRNBERGER, T., & LIPKA, V. (2005) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00279.x · Cited by 346
Regulation of gene expression by jasmonate hormones
Memelink, J. (2009) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.09.004 · Cited by 189
Induced plant secondary metabolites for phytopatogenic fungi control: a review
Ribera, A. E., & Zuñiga, G. (2012) · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition · doi:10.4067/s0718-95162012005000040 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomma, B. P. H. J., Nelissen, I., Eggermont, K., & Broekaert, W. F.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 163-171
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2122812111
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deficiency in phytoalexin production causes enhanced susceptibility of Arabidopsis thaliana to the fungus Alternaria brassicicola. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00513.x
- The paper
- Thomma, B. P. H. J., Nelissen, I., Eggermont, K., & Broekaert, W. F. (1999). Deficiency in phytoalexin production causes enhanced susceptibility of Arabidopsis thaliana to the fungus Alternaria brassicicola. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00513.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.