The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vitro synthesis and properties of pectin/Acetobacter xylinus cellulose composites
Abstract
Summary: Pectin and cellulose are major components of most primary cell walls, yet little is known about the way in which they interact either during assembly or in subsequent functional performance of the wall. As a mimic of cell wall assembly, we studied the formation of molecular composites formed by deposition of cellulose from Acetobacter xylinus into pectin/calcium systems, and the molecular, architectural and mechanical properties of the composites obtained. The formation of interpenetrating cellulose/pectin composite networks (as envisaged in current models for primary cell walls) required a pre‐existing, but not too strong, pectin network. For pectin either in solution or strongly networked, phase separation from cellulose occurred, providing two physical models for the formation of middle lamellae. Composite networks showed no evidence of direct molecular interaction between the components, but pectin networks became more aggregated following deposition of cellulose into them. The shear strength under small deformation conditions for cellulose/pectin composites was very similar to that of cellulose alone. In contrast, under uniaxial tension, extensibility was greatly increased and stiffness decreased. These major changes were due to the effect of pectin on cellulose network architecture at deposition, as they were maintained upon removal of the pectin component. These results show that the presence and physical state of pectin at the time of cellulose deposition in muro may be a significant determinant of subsequent extensibility without compromising strength.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New method for quantitative determination of uronic acids
Blumenkrantz, N., & Asboe-Hansen, G. (1973) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(73)90377-1 · Cited by 7,140
Cited by
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Evidence for In Vitro Binding of Pectin Side Chains to Cellulose
Zykwinska, A. W., Ralet, M.-C. J., Garnier, C. D., & Thibault, J.-F. J. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.065912 · Cited by 398
Bouton, S., Leboeuf, E., Mouille, G., Leydecker, M.-T., Talbotec, J., Granier, F., Lahaye, M., Höfte, H., & Truong, H.-N. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.004259 · Cited by 375
Molecular insights into the complex mechanics of plant epidermal cell walls
Zhang, Y., Yu, J., Wang, X., Durachko, D. M., Zhang, S., & Cosgrove, D. J. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf2824 · Cited by 341
Transfer Cells: Cells Specialized for a Special Purpose
Offler, C. E., McCurdy, D. W., Patrick, J. W., & Talbot, M. J. (2003) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134812 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Chanliaud, E., & Gidley, M. J.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-35
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2169481032
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro synthesis and properties of pectin/Acetobacter xylinus cellulose composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00571.x
- The paper
- Chanliaud, E., & Gidley, M. J. (1999). In vitro synthesis and properties of pectin/Acetobacter xylinus cellulose composites. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00571.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.