Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

T‐DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice

Open access
Jeon, Jong‐Seong, Lee, Sichul, Jung, Ki‐Hong, Jun, Sung‐Hoon, Jeong, Dong‐Hoon, Lee, Jinwon, Kim, Chanhong, Jang, Seonghoe, Lee, Shinyoung, Yang, Kiyoung, Nam, Jongmin, An, Kyungsook, Han, Min‐Jung, Sung, Ryo‐Jin, Choi, Hyun‐Sook, Yu, Jung‐Hwa, Choi, Jung‐Hwan, Cho, Se‐Yu, Cha, Sang‐Su, Kim, Shi‐In, An, Gynheung·2000·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: We have produced 22 090 primary transgenic rice plants that carry a T‐DNA insertion, which has resulted in 18 358 fertile lines. Genomic DNA gel‐blot and PCR analyses have shown that approximately 65% of the population contains more than one copy of the inserted T‐DNA. Hygromycin resistance tests revealed that transgenic plants contain an average of 1.4 loci of T‐DNA inserts. Therefore, it can be estimated that approximately 25 700 taggings have been generated. The binary vector used in the insertion contained the promoterless β‐glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene with an intron and multiple splicing donors and acceptors immediately next to the right border. Therefore, this gene trap vector is able to detect a gene fusion between GUS and an endogenous gene, which is tagged by T‐DNA. Histochemical GUS assays were carried out in the leaves and roots from 5353 lines, mature flowers from 7026 lines, and developing seeds from 1948 lines. The data revealed that 1.6–2.1% of tested organs were GUS‐positive in the tested organs, and that their GUS expression patterns were organ‐ or tissue‐specific or ubiquitous in all parts of the plant. The large population of T‐DNA‐tagged lines will be useful for identifying insertional mutants in various genes and for discovering new genes in rice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00767.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 714

Metadata

Authors
Jeon, J., Lee, S., Jung, K., Jun, S., Jeong, D., Lee, J., Kim, C., Jang, S., Lee, S., Yang, K., Nam, J., An, K., Han, M., Sung, R., Choi, H., Yu, J., Choi, J., Cho, S., Cha, S., Kim, S., & An, G.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
561-570
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2151940278
Cited by
714
References
0
FWCI
28.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T‐DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00767.x
The paper
Jeon, J., Lee, S., Jung, K., Jun, S., Jeong, D., Lee, J., Kim, C., Jang, S., Lee, S., Yang, K., Nam, J., An, K., Han, M., Sung, R., Choi, H., Yu, J., Choi, J., Cho, S., Cha, S., . . . An, G. (2000). T‐DNA insertional mutagenesis for functional genomics in rice. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00767.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.