Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 242

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxidative burst and cognate redox signalling reported by luciferase imaging: identification of a signal network that functions independently of ethylene, SA and Me‐JA but is dependent on MAPKK activity

Open access
Grant, John J., Yun, Byung‐Wook, Loake, Gary J.·2000·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Recognition of avirulent microbial pathogens activates an oxidative burst leading to the accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates (ROIs), which are thought to integrate a diverse set of defence mechanisms resulting in the establishment of plant disease resistance. A novel transgenic Arabidopsis line containing a gst1::luc transgene was developed and employed to report the temporal and spatial dynamics of ROI accumulation and cognate redox signalling in response to attempted infection by avirulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst). Strong engagement of the oxidative burst was dependent on the presence of functional Pst hrpS and hrpA gene products. Experiments employing pharmacological agents suggested that at least two distinct sources, including an NADPH oxidase and a peroxidase‐type enzyme, contributed to the generation of redox cues. The analysis of gst1 and pal1 gene expression in nahG, coi1 and etr1 plants suggested that engagement of the oxidative burst and cognate redox signalling functioned independently of salicylic acid, methyl jasmonate and ethylene. In contrast, studies using a panel of protein kinase and phosphatase inhibitors and in‐gel kinase assays in these mutant backgrounds suggested that a 48 kDa mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity was required for the activation of gst1 and pal1 in response to redox cues. Thus the engagement of a bifurcating redox signalling pathway possessing a MAPK module may contribute both to the establishment of plant disease resistance, and to the development of cellular protectant mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00902.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 242

Metadata

Authors
Grant, J. J., Yun, B., & Loake, G. J.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
569-582
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2154066287
Cited by
242
References
1
FWCI
26.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oxidative burst and cognate redox signalling reported by luciferase imaging: identification of a signal network that functions independently of ethylene, SA and Me‐JA but is dependent on MAPKK activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00902.x
The paper
Grant, J. J., Yun, B., & Loake, G. J. (2000). Oxidative burst and cognate redox signalling reported by luciferase imaging: identification of a signal network that functions independently of ethylene, SA and Me‐JA but is dependent on MAPKK activity. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00902.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.