The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae conferred by an Arabidopsis thaliana coronatine‐insensitive (coi1) mutation occurs through two distinct mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
Summary: A new allele of the coronatine‐insensitive locus (COI1) was isolated in a screen for Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with enhanced resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. This mutant, designated coi1‐20, exhibits robust resistance to several P. syringae isolates but remains susceptible to the virulent pathogens Erisyphe and cauliflower mosaic virus. Resistance to P. syringae strain Pst DC3000 in coi1‐20 plants is correlated with hyperactivation of PR‐1 expression and accumulation of elevated levels of salicylic acid (SA) following infection, suggesting that the SA‐mediated defense response pathway is sensitized in this mutant. Restriction of growth of Pst DC3000 in coi1‐20 leaves is partially dependent on NPR1 and fully dependent on SA, indicating that SA‐mediated defenses are required for restriction of Pst DC3000 growth in coi1‐20 plants. Surprisingly, despite high levels of Pst DC3000 growth in coi1‐20 plants carrying the salicylate hydroxylase (nahG) transgene, these plants do not exhibit disease symptoms. Thus resistance to P. syringae in coi1‐20 plants is conferred by two different mechanisms: (i) restriction of pathogen growth via activation of the SA‐dependent defense pathway; and (ii) an SA‐independent inability to develop disease symptoms. These findings are consistent with the hypotheses that the P. syringae phytotoxin coronatine acts to promote virulence by inhibiting host defense responses and by promoting lesion formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense
Kunkel, B. N., & Brooks, D. M. (2002) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(02)00275-3 · Cited by 1,451
Self-citationLi, J., Brader, G., & Palva, E. T. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.016980 · Cited by 1,207
Turner, J. G., Ellis, C., & Devoto, A. (2002) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.000679 · Cited by 1,157
Fernández-Calvo, P., Chini, A., Fernández-Barbero, G., Chico, J.-M., Gimenez-Ibanez, S., Geerinck, J., Eeckhout, D., Schweizer, F., Godoy, M., Franco-Zorrilla, J. M., et al. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.110.080788 · Cited by 1,156
Buell, C. R., Joardar, V., Lindeberg, M., Selengut, J., Paulsen, I. T., Gwinn, M. L., Dodson, R. J., Deboy, R. T., Durkin, A. S., Kolonay, J. F., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1731982100 · Cited by 836
Metadata
- Authors
- Kloek, A. P., Verbsky, M. L., Sharma, S. B., Schoelz, J. E., Vogel, J., Klessig, D. F., & Kunkel, B. N.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 509-522
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2167439121
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae conferred by an Arabidopsis thaliana coronatine‐insensitive (coi1) mutation occurs through two distinct mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01050.x
- The paper
- Kloek, A. P., Verbsky, M. L., Sharma, S. B., Schoelz, J. E., Vogel, J., Klessig, D. F., & Kunkel, B. N. (2001). Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae conferred by an Arabidopsis thaliana coronatine‐insensitive (coi1) mutation occurs through two distinct mechanisms. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01050.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.