Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The circadian clock regulated RNA‐binding protein AtGRP7 autoregulates its expression by influencing alternative splicing of its own pre‐mRNA

Staiger, Dorothee, Zecca, Laura, Kirk, Dominika A. Wieczorek, Apel, Klaus, Eckstein, Luca·2003·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: The clock‐regulated RNA‐binding protein AtGRP7 is part of a negative feedback circuit through which the protein influences circadian oscillations of its own transcript. Constitutive overexpression of AtGRP7 in transgenic plants leads to the appearance of a low amount of an alternatively spliced Atgrp7 transcript with a premature stop codon. It is generated by the use of a 5′ cryptic splice site in the middle of the intron at the expense of the fully spliced mRNA, indicating a role for AtGRP7 in splice site selection. Accelerated decay of this transcript accounts for its low steady state abundance. This implicates a mechanism for the AtGRP7 feedback loop: Atgrp7 expression is downregulated, as AtGRP7 protein accumulates over the circadian cycle, partly by the generation of an alternate transcript that due to its instability does not accumulate to high levels and does not produce a functional protein. Recombinant AtGRP7 protein specifically interacts with the 3′ untranslated region and the intron of its transcript, suggesting that the shift in splice site selection and downregulation involves binding of AtGRP7 to its pre‐mRNA. AtGRP7 also influences the choice of splice sites in the Atgrp8 transcript encoding a related RNA‐binding protein, favoring the production of an alternatively spliced, unstable Atgrp8 transcript. This conservation points to the importance of this regulatory mechanism to control the level of the clock‐regulated glycine‐rich RNA‐binding proteins and shows how AtGRP7 can control abundance of target transcripts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01629.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Staiger, D., Zecca, L., Kirk, D. A. W., Apel, K., & Eckstein, L.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
361-371
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2154026614
Cited by
234
References
1
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The circadian clock regulated RNA‐binding protein AtGRP7 autoregulates its expression by influencing alternative splicing of its own pre‐mRNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01629.x
The paper
Staiger, D., Zecca, L., Kirk, D. A. W., Apel, K., & Eckstein, L. (2003). The circadian clock regulated RNA‐binding protein AtGRP7 autoregulates its expression by influencing alternative splicing of its own pre‐mRNA. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01629.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.