The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The circadian clock regulated RNA‐binding protein AtGRP7 autoregulates its expression by influencing alternative splicing of its own pre‐mRNA
Abstract
Summary: The clock‐regulated RNA‐binding protein AtGRP7 is part of a negative feedback circuit through which the protein influences circadian oscillations of its own transcript. Constitutive overexpression of AtGRP7 in transgenic plants leads to the appearance of a low amount of an alternatively spliced Atgrp7 transcript with a premature stop codon. It is generated by the use of a 5′ cryptic splice site in the middle of the intron at the expense of the fully spliced mRNA, indicating a role for AtGRP7 in splice site selection. Accelerated decay of this transcript accounts for its low steady state abundance. This implicates a mechanism for the AtGRP7 feedback loop: Atgrp7 expression is downregulated, as AtGRP7 protein accumulates over the circadian cycle, partly by the generation of an alternate transcript that due to its instability does not accumulate to high levels and does not produce a functional protein. Recombinant AtGRP7 protein specifically interacts with the 3′ untranslated region and the intron of its transcript, suggesting that the shift in splice site selection and downregulation involves binding of AtGRP7 to its pre‐mRNA. AtGRP7 also influences the choice of splice sites in the Atgrp8 transcript encoding a related RNA‐binding protein, favoring the production of an alternatively spliced, unstable Atgrp8 transcript. This conservation points to the importance of this regulatory mechanism to control the level of the clock‐regulated glycine‐rich RNA‐binding proteins and shows how AtGRP7 can control abundance of target transcripts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Bases for Circadian Clocks
Dunlap, J. C. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80566-8 · Cited by 2,900
Cited by
Reumann, S., Babujee, L., Ma, C., Wienkoop, S., Siemsen, T., Antonicelli, G. E., Rasche, N., Lüder, F., Weckwerth, W., & Jahn, O. (2007) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.107.050989 · Cited by 351
Alternative splicing resulting in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: what is the meaning of nonsense?
McGlincy, N. J., & Smith, C. W. J. (2008) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2008.06.001 · Cited by 346
The evolving roles of alternative splicing
Lareau, L. F., Green, R. E., Bhatnagar, R. S., & Brenner, S. E. (2004) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2004.05.002 · Cited by 310
Lim, M.-H., Kim, J., Kim, Y.-S., Chung, K.-S., Seo, Y.-H., Lee, I., Kim, J., Hong, C. B., Kim, H.-J., & Park, C.-M. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.019331 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Staiger, D., Zecca, L., Kirk, D. A. W., Apel, K., & Eckstein, L.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 361-371
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2154026614
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The circadian clock regulated RNA‐binding protein AtGRP7 autoregulates its expression by influencing alternative splicing of its own pre‐mRNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01629.x
- The paper
- Staiger, D., Zecca, L., Kirk, D. A. W., Apel, K., & Eckstein, L. (2003). The circadian clock regulated RNA‐binding protein AtGRP7 autoregulates its expression by influencing alternative splicing of its own pre‐mRNA. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01629.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.