The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transcriptome analysis of sulfur depletion in Arabidopsis thaliana: interlacing of biosynthetic pathways provides response specificity
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Higher plants assimilate inorganic sulfate into cysteine, which is subsequently converted to methionine, and into a variety of other sulfur‐containing organic compounds. To resist sulfur deficiency, plants must demonstrate physiological flexibility: the expression of an extensive set of genes and gene regulators that act in the affected pathways or signalling cascades must be delicately tuned in response to environmental challenges. To elucidate this network of interactions, we have applied an array hybridisation/transcript profiling method to Arabidopsis plants subjected to 6, 10 and 13 days of constitutive and induced sulfur starvation. The temporal expression behaviour of approximately 7200 non‐redundant genes was analysed simultaneously. The experiment was designed in a way to identify statistically significant changes of gene expression based on sufficient numbers of repeated hybridisations performed with five uniform pools of plant material. The expression profiles were processed to select differentially expressed genes. Among the 1507 sulfur‐responsive clones implicated in this way, 632 genes responded specifically to sulfur deficiency by significant over‐expression. The sulfur‐responsive genes were grouped according to functional categories or biosynthetic pathways. As expected, genes of the sulfur assimilation pathway were altered in expression. Furthermore, genes involved in flavonoid, auxin, and jasmonate biosynthesis pathways were upregulated in conditions of sulfur deficiency. Based on the correlative analysis of gene expression patterns, we suggest that a complex co‐ordination of systematic responses to sulfur depletion is provided via integration of flavonoid, auxin and jasmonate pathway elements. Plait concept for transduction of specificity via the main non‐specific signalling stream is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Significance of flavonoids in plant resistance: a review
Treutter, D. (2006) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-006-0068-8 · Cited by 1,253
Takahashi, H., Kopriva, S., Giordano, M., Saito, K., & Hell, R. (2011) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103921 · Cited by 893
The nodule inception‐like protein 7 modulates nitrate sensing and metabolism in Arabidopsis
Castaings, L., Camargo, A., Pocholle, D., Gaudon, V., Texier, Y., Boutet‐Mercey, S., Taconnat, L., Renou, J., Daniel‐Vedele, F., Fernandez, E., et al. (2009) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03695.x · Cited by 469
Specific functions of individual class III peroxidase genes
Cosio, C., & Dunand, C. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ern318 · Cited by 444
Plant metabolomics: towards biological function and mechanism
SCHAUER, N., & FERNIE, A. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2006.08.007 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Nikiforova, V., Freitag, J., Kempa, S., Adamik, M., Hesse, H., & Hoefgen, R.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 633-650
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2146725029
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcriptome analysis of sulfur depletion in Arabidopsis thaliana: interlacing of biosynthetic pathways provides response specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01657.x
- The paper
- Nikiforova, V., Freitag, J., Kempa, S., Adamik, M., Hesse, H., & Hoefgen, R. (2003). Transcriptome analysis of sulfur depletion in Arabidopsis thaliana: interlacing of biosynthetic pathways provides response specificity. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01657.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.