The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Barley sex6 mutants lack starch synthase IIa activity and contain a starch with novel properties
Abstract
Summary: Analysis of barley shrunken grain mutants has identified lines with a novel high amylose starch phenotype. The causal mutation is located at the sex6 locus on chromosome 7H, suggesting the starch synthase IIa (ssIIa) gene as a candidate gene altered by the mutation. Consistent with this hypothesis, no evidence of SSIIa protein expression in either the starch granule or soluble fractions of the endosperm was found. Sequences of the starch synthase IIa gene, ssIIa, from three independent sex6 lines showed the presence of a stop codon preventing translation of the ssIIa transcript in each line. Perfect segregation of the starch phenotype with the presence of stop codons in the ssIIa gene was obtained, providing strong evidence for the lesion in the ssIIa gene being the causal mutation for the sex6 phenotype. The loss of SSIIa activity in barley leads to novel and informative phenotypes. First, a decrease in amylopectin synthesis to less than 20% of the wild‐type levels indicates that SSIIa accounts for the majority of the amylopectin polymer elongation activity in barley. Secondly, in contrast to high amylose starches resulting from branching enzyme downregulation, the sex6 starches have a shortened amylopectin chain length distribution and a reduced gelatinisation temperature. Thirdly, the mutation leads to pleiotropic effects on other enzymes of the starch biosynthesis pathway, abolishing the binding of SSI, branching enzyme IIa and branching enzyme IIb to the starch granules of sex6 mutants, while not significantly altering their expression levels in the soluble fraction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resistant Starch: Promise for Improving Human Health
Birt, D. F., Boylston, T., Hendrich, S., Jane, J.-L., Hollis, J., Li, L., McClelland, J., Moore, S., Phillips, G. J., Rowling, M., et al. (2013) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.113.004325 · Cited by 852
The diurnal metabolism of leaf starch
Zeeman, S. C., Smith, S. M., & Smith, A. M. (2007) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20061393 · Cited by 443
Formation of starch in plant cells
Pfister, B., & Zeeman, S. C. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2250-x · Cited by 423
Balet, S., Guelpa, A., Fox, G., & Manley, M. (2019) · Food Analytical Methods · doi:10.1007/s12161-019-01581-w · Cited by 414
Tetlow, I. J., Wait, R., Lu, Z., Akkasaeng, R., Bowsher, C. G., Esposito, S., Kosar-Hashemi, B., Morell, M. K., & Emes, M. J. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.017400 · Cited by 391
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Morell, M. K., Kosar‐Hashemi, B., Cmiel, M., Samuel, M. S., Chandler, P., Rahman, S., Buleon, A., Batey, I. L., & Li, Z.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-185
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2057320467
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barley sex6 mutants lack starch synthase IIa activity and contain a starch with novel properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01712.x
- The paper
- Morell, M. K., Kosar‐Hashemi, B., Cmiel, M., Samuel, M. S., Chandler, P., Rahman, S., Buleon, A., Batey, I. L., & Li, Z. (2003). Barley sex6 mutants lack starch synthase IIa activity and contain a starch with novel properties. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01712.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.