Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 233

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Why green fluorescent fusion proteins have not been observed in the vacuoles of higher plants

Open access
Tamura, Kentaro, Shimada, Tomoo, Ono, Eiichiro, Tanaka, Yoshikazu, Nagatani, Akira, Higashi, Sho‐ich, Watanabe, Masakatsu, Nishimura, Mikio, Hara‐Nishimura, Ikuko·2003·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Green fluorescent protein (GFP) makes it possible for organelles and protein transport pathways to be visualized in living cells. However, GFP fluorescence has not yet been observed in the vacuoles of any organs of higher plants. We found that the fluorescence of a vacuole‐targeted GFP was stably observed in the vacuoles of transgenic Arabidopsis plants under dark conditions, and that the fluorescence rapidly disappeared under light conditions. The vacuolar GFP was rapidly degraded within 1 h in the light, especially blue light. An inhibitor of vacuolar type H + ‐ATPase, concanamycin A, and an inhibitor of papain‐type cysteine proteinase, E‐64d, abolished both the light‐dependent disappearance of GFP fluorescence and GFP degradation in the vacuoles. An in vitro assay showed that bacterially expressed GFP was degraded by extracts of Arabidopsis cultured‐cell protoplasts at an acidic pH in the light. These results suggest that blue light induced a conformational change in GFP, and the resulting GFP in the vacuole was easily degraded by vacuolar papain‐type cysteine proteinase(s) under the acidic pH. The light‐dependent degradation accounts for the failure to observe GFP fluorescence in the vacuoles of plant organs. Our results show that stable GFP‐fluoresced vacuoles are achieved by transferring the plants from the light into the dark before inspection with a fluorescent microscope. This might eliminate a large hurdle in studies of the vacuolar‐targeting machinery and the organ‐ and stage‐specific differentiation of endomembrane systems in plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01822.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 233

Metadata

Authors
Tamura, K., Shimada, T., Ono, E., Tanaka, Y., Nagatani, A., Higashi, S., Watanabe, M., Nishimura, M., & Hara‐Nishimura, I.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-22
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
545-555
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1998141700
Cited by
233
References
0
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why green fluorescent fusion proteins have not been observed in the vacuoles of higher plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01822.x
The paper
Tamura, K., Shimada, T., Ono, E., Tanaka, Y., Nagatani, A., Higashi, S., Watanabe, M., Nishimura, M., & Hara‐Nishimura, I. (2003). Why green fluorescent fusion proteins have not been observed in the vacuoles of higher plants. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01822.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.