Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of clinical findings according to sex in 2313 Turkish patients with Behçet's disease

Tursen, Umit, Gurler, Aysel, Boyvat, Ayse·2003·International Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Behçet's disease is a multisystem disease featuring mucocutaneous, ocular, articular, vascular, intestinal, urogenital, and neurologic involvement and occurs with a high prevalence in the Mediterranean including Turkey. Higher incidence of severe clinical course and systemic involvement is observed in male patients. Objective To determine the influence of sex on the clinical course of Behçet’ s disease. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the clinical findings of 2313 Behçet patients followed up at the multidisciplinary Behçet's Disease Center at Ankara University. Results The male/female patient ratio was 1.03. Oral aphthae was seen in all patients. In male Behçet patients, the prevalence of mucocutaneous lesions and systemic manifestations was as follows: 85.6% genital aphthae, 45.5% erythema nodosum, 59.5% papulopustular lesions, 17.5% thrombophlebitis, 38.1% ocular involvement, 11.3% articular involvement, 11.7% vascular involvement, 3.3% neurologic involvement, 1.4% gastrointestinal involvement, and 1.8% pulmonary involvement. In female Behçet patients, the prevalence of manifestations were as follows: 91% genital aphthae, 49.8% erythema nodosum, 48.3% papulopustular lesions, 3.5% thrombophlebitis, 19.8% ocular involvement, 11.8% articular involvement, 2.1% vascular involvement, 1.3% neurologic involvement, 1.4% gastrointestinal involvement, and 0.03% pulmonary involvement. Conclusions Only genital aphthae and erythema nodosum were more frequent in females. On the other hand papulopustular eruptions, thrombophlebitis, ocular, neurologic, pulmonary and vascular involvement were more frequent in males. While female patients had the best prognosis, male patients had a worse overall prognosis than females.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01741.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 305

Metadata

Authors
Tursen, U., Gurler, A., & Boyvat, A.
Venue
International Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
346-351
ISSN
  • 0011-9059 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-4632
OpenAlex
W2074892708
Cited by
305
References
5
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of clinical findings according to sex in 2313 Turkish patients with Behçet's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01741.x
The paper
Tursen, U., Gurler, A., & Boyvat, A. (2003). Evaluation of clinical findings according to sex in 2313 Turkish patients with Behçet's disease. International Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01741.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.