The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies of ultracompact H ii regions - II. High-resolution radio continuum and methanol maser survey
Open accessAbstract
High spatial resolution radio continuum and 6.67-GHz methanol spectral line data are presented for methanol masers previously detected by Walsh et al. (1997). Methanol maser and/or radio continuum emission is found in 364 cases towards IRAS-selected regions. For those sources with methanol maser emission, relative positions have been obtained to an accuracy of typically 0.05 arcsec, with absolute positions accurate to around 1 arcsec. Maps of selected sources are provided. The intensity of the maser emission does not seem to depend on the presence of a continuum source. The coincidence of water and methanol maser positions in some regions suggests there is overlap in the requirements for methanol and water maser emission to be observable. However, there is a striking difference between the general proximity of methanol and water masers to both cometary and irregularly shaped ultracompact (UC) H ii regions, indicating that, in other cases, there must be differing environments conducive to stimulating their emission. We show that the methanol maser is most likely present before an observable UC H ii region is formed around a massive star and is quickly destroyed as the UC H ii region evolves. There are 36 out of 97 maser sites that are linearly extended. The hypothesis that the maser emission is found in a circumstellar disc is not inconsistent with these 36 maser sites, but is unlikely. It cannot, however, account for all other maser sites. An alternative model which uses shocks to create the masing spots can more readily reproduce the maser spot distributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward Understanding Massive Star Formation
Zinnecker, H., & Yorke, H. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092549 · Cited by 1,248
The Spitzer/GLIMPSE Surveys: A New View of the Milky Way
Churchwell, E., Babler, B. L., Meade, M. R., Whitney, B. A., Benjamin, R., Indebetouw, R., Cyganowski, C., Robitaille, T. P., Povich, M., Watson, C., et al. (2009) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/597811 · Cited by 1,047
Caswell, J. L., Fuller, G. A., Green, J. A., Avison, A., Breen, S. L., Brooks, K. J., Burton, M. G., Chrysostomou, A., Cox, J., Diamond, P. J., et al. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16339.x · Cited by 270
Self-citationYusef-Zadeh, F., Hewitt, J. W., Arendt, R. G., Whitney, B., Rieke, G., Wardle, M., Hinz, J. L., Stolovy, S., Lang, C. C., Burton, M. G., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/1/178 · Cited by 217
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, A. J., Burton, M. G., Hyland, A. R., & Robinson, G.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 640-698
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2158491334
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies of ultracompact H ii regions - II. High-resolution radio continuum and methanol maser survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02014.x
- The paper
- Walsh, A. J., Burton, M. G., Hyland, A. R., & Robinson, G. (1998). Studies of ultracompact H ii regions - II. High-resolution radio continuum and methanol maser survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02014.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.