Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non-linear stochastic galaxy biasing in cosmological simulations

Open access
Somerville, R. S., Lemson, G., Sigad, Y., Dekel, A., Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M.·2001·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We study the biasing relation between dark matter haloes or galaxies and the underlying mass distribution, using cosmological N-body simulations in which galaxies are modelled via semi-analytic recipes. The non-linear, stochastic biasing is quantified in terms of the mean biasing function and the scatter about it as a function of time, scale and object properties. The biasing of galaxies and haloes shows a general similarity and a characteristic shape, with no galaxies in deep voids and a steep slope in moderately underdense regions. At a comoving scale of ∼8h−1Mpc, the non-linearity in the biasing relation is typically ≲10per cent and the stochasticity is a few tens of per cent, corresponding to ∼30per cent variations in the cosmological parameter β=Ω0.6/b Biasing depends weakly on halo mass, galaxy luminosity, and scale. The observed trend with luminosity is reproduced when dust extinction is included. The time evolution is rapid, with the mean biasing larger by a factor of a few at z∼3 compared with z= 0, and with a minimum for the non-linearity and stochasticity at an intermediate redshift. Biasing today is a weak function of the cosmological model, reflecting the weak dependence on the power-spectrum shape, but the time evolution is more cosmology-dependent, reflecting the effect of the growth rate. We provide predictions for the relative biasing of galaxies of different type and colour, to be compared with upcoming large redshift surveys. Analytic models in which the number of objects is conserved underestimate the evolution of biasing, while models that explicitly account for merging provide a good description of the biasing of haloes and its evolution, suggesting that merging is a crucial element in the evolution of biasing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03894.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Somerville, R. S., Lemson, G., Sigad, Y., Dekel, A., Kauffmann, G., & White, S. D. M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2001-01-21
Volume
320
Issue
3
Pages
289-306
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2049137639
Cited by
168
References
1
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-linear stochastic galaxy biasing in cosmological simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03894.x
The paper
Somerville, R. S., Lemson, G., Sigad, Y., Dekel, A., Kauffmann, G., & White, S. D. M. (2001). Non-linear stochastic galaxy biasing in cosmological simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03894.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.