Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Power-spectrum normalization from the local abundance of rich clusters of galaxies

Open access
Pierpaoli, E., Scott, D., White, M.·2001·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The number density of rich galaxy clusters still provides the most robust way of normalizing the power spectrum of dark matter perturbations on scales relevant to large-scale structure. We revisit this constraint in the light of several recent developments: (1) the availability of well-defined samples of local clusters with relatively accurate X-ray temperatures; (2) new theoretical mass functions for dark matter haloes, which provide a good fit to large numerical simulations; (3) more accurate mass-temperature relations from larger catalogues of hydrodynamical simulations; (4) the requirement to consider closed as well as open and flat cosmologies to obtain full multiparameter likelihood constraints for CMB and SNe studies. We present a new sample of clusters drawn from the literature and use this sample to obtain improved results on σ8, the normalization of the matter power spectrum on scales of 8 h−1 Mpc, as a function of the matter density and cosmological constant in a universe with general curvature. We discuss our differences with previous work, and the remaining major sources of uncertainty. Final results on the normalization, approximately independent of power spectrum shape, can be expressed as constraints on σ at an appropriate cluster normalization scale RCl. We provide fitting formulas for RCl and σ(RCl) for general cosmologies, as well as for σ8 as a function of cosmology and shape parameter Γ. For flat models we find approximately σ8≃(0.495−0.037+0.034)ΩM−0.60 for Γ = 0.23, where the error bar is dominated by uncertainty in the mass-temperature relation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04306.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544 · cited 1×

    “…the NFW form (Navarro, Frenk & White 1996): ρ(r) ∝ x−1 (1 + x)−2 , (12) where x = r/rs and rs is a scale radius usually specified in terms of the concentration parameter c ≡ r200/rs. Navarro et al. (1996) refer to r200 and M200 throughout as the ‘virial radius’ and ‘virial mass’ respectively.”
    Background
  • The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields

    Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Pierpaoli, E., Scott, D., & White, M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2001-07-11
Volume
325
Issue
1
Pages
77-88
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2149039653
Cited by
181
References
2
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power-spectrum normalization from the local abundance of rich clusters of galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04306.x
The paper
Pierpaoli, E., Scott, D., & White, M. (2001). Power-spectrum normalization from the local abundance of rich clusters of galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04306.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.