The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of intrinsic alignments in galaxy ellipticities
Open accessAbstract
We measure the alignment of galaxy ellipticities in the local Universe over a range of scales using digitized photographic data from the SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey. We find for a magnitude cut of bJ<20.5, corresponding to a median galaxy redshift of z≈0.1, and 2×106 galaxies, that the galaxy ellipticities exhibit a non-zero correlation over a range of scales between 1 and 100 arcmin. We detect this correlation in two colours, bJ and R and, most significantly, in the cross-correlation between the two bands, which is less likely to be contaminated by systematics. In particular, we measure the variance of mean galaxy ellipticities, σ2(θ), in square angular cells on the sky as a function of cell size and find that it lies in the range, 2×10-4≥σ2(θ)≳1×10-5 for cell side lengths of between 15≤θ≤100 arcmin. Considering the low median redshift of the galaxies in the sample and hence the relatively low effective cross-section for lensing of these galaxies by the large-scale structure of the Universe, we propose that we have detected an intrinsic alignment of galaxy ellipticities. We compare our results with recent analytical and numerical predictions made for intrinsic galaxy alignment and find good agreement. We discuss the importance of these results for measuring cosmic shear from upcoming shallow surveys (e.g. the Sloan Digital Sky Survey) and we outline how these measurements could possibly be used to constrain models of galaxy formation and/or measure the mass distribution in the local Universe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heymans, C., Grocutt, E., Heavens, A., Kilbinger, M., Kitching, T. D., Simpson, F., Benjamin, J., Erben, T., Hildebrandt, H., Hoekstra, H., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt601 · Cited by 649
Self-citationEuclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso, J. A., Achúcarro, A., Adamek, J., Adam, R., Addison, G. E., Aghanim, N., Aguena, M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 · Cited by 616
Self-citationIntrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear
Hirata, C. M., & Seljak, U. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.063526 · Cited by 586
Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Bridle, S., & King, L. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444 · Cited by 492
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, M. L., Taylor, A. N., Hambly, N. C., & Dye, S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 333
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 501-509
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2151112274
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of intrinsic alignments in galaxy ellipticities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05354.x
- The paper
- Brown, M. L., Taylor, A. N., Hambly, N. C., & Dye, S. (2002). Measurement of intrinsic alignments in galaxy ellipticities. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05354.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.