Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 629

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the bias of galaxies and the density of the Universe

Open access
Verde, Licia, Heavens, Alan F., Percival, Will J., Matarrese, Sabino, Baugh, Carlton M., Bland-Hawthorn, Joss, Bridges, Terry, Cannon, Russell, Cole, Shaun, Colless, Matthew, Collins, Chris, Couch, Warrick, Dalton, Gavin, De Propris, Roberto, Driver, Simon P., Efstathiou, George, Ellis, Richard S., Frenk, Carlos S., Glazebrook, Karl, Jackson, Carole, Lahav, Ofer, Lewis, Ian, Lumsden, Stuart, Maddox, Steve, Madgwick, Darren, Norberg, Peder, Peacock, John A., Peterson, Bruce A., Sutherland, Will, Taylor, Keith·2002·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We compute the bispectrum of the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (2dFGRS) and use it to measure the bias parameter of the galaxies. This parameter quantifies the strength of clustering of the galaxies relative to the mass in the Universe. By analysing 80 × 106 triangle configurations in the wavenumber range 0.1 < k < 0.5 h Mpc−1 (i.e. on scales roughly between 5 and 30 h−1 Mpc) we find that the linear bias parameter is consistent with unity: b1= 1.04 ± 0.11, and the quadratic (non-linear) bias is consistent with zero: b2=−0.054 ± 0.08. Thus, at least on large scales, optically selected galaxies do indeed trace the underlying mass distribution. The bias parameter can be combined with the 2dFGRS measurement of the redshift distortion parameter β≃Ωm0.6/b1, to yield Ωm= 0.27 ± 0.06 for the matter density of the Universe, a result that is determined entirely from this survey, independent of other data sets. Our measurement of the matter density of the Universe should be interpreted as Ωm at the effective redshift of the survey (z= 0.17).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05620.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 629

Metadata

Authors
Verde, L., Heavens, A. F., Percival, W. J., Matarrese, S., Baugh, C. M., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R., Cole, S., Colless, M., Collins, C., Couch, W., Dalton, G., De Propris, R., Driver, S. P., Efstathiou, G., Ellis, R. S., Frenk, C. S., Glazebrook, K., Jackson, C., Lahav, O., Lewis, I., Lumsden, S., Maddox, S., Madgwick, D., Norberg, P., Peacock, J. A., Peterson, B. A., Sutherland, W., & Taylor, K.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2002-09
Volume
335
Issue
2
Pages
432-440
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2110238788
Cited by
629
References
1
FWCI
40.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the bias of galaxies and the density of the Universe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05620.x
The paper
Verde, L., Heavens, A. F., Percival, W. J., Matarrese, S., Baugh, C. M., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R., Cole, S., Colless, M., Collins, C., Couch, W., Dalton, G., De Propris, R., Driver, S. P., Efstathiou, G., Ellis, R. S., Frenk, C. S., Glazebrook, K., . . . Taylor, K. (2002). The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: the bias of galaxies and the density of the Universe. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05620.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.