The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intrinsic correlation of halo ellipticity and its implications for large-scale weak lensing surveys
Open accessAbstract
We use a large set of state-of-the-art cosmological N-body simulations [5123 particles] to study the intrinsic ellipticity correlation functions of haloes. With the simulations of different resolutions, we find that the ellipticity correlations converge once the haloes have more than 160 members. For haloes with fewer members, the correlations are underestimated, and the underestimation amounts to a factor of 2 when the haloes have only 20 particles. After correcting for the resolution effects, we show that the ellipticity correlations of haloes in the bigger box L= 300 h−1 Mpc) agree very well with those obtained in the smaller box (L= 100 h−1 Mpc). Combining these results from the different simulation boxes, we present accurate fitting formulae for the ellipticity correlation function c11(r) and for the projected correlation functions Σ11(rp) and Σ22(rp) over three orders of magnitude in halo mass. The latter two functions are useful for predicting the contribution of the intrinsic correlations to deep lensing surveys. With reasonable assumptions for the redshift distribution of galaxies and for the mass of galaxies, we find that the intrinsic ellipticity correlation can contribute significantly not only to shallow surveys but also to deep surveys. Our results indicate that previous similar studies significantly underestimated this contribution for their limited simulation resolutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cosmological simulations of galaxy formation
Vogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., Torrey, P., & Puchwein, E. (2020) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0127-2 · Cited by 614
Intrinsic alignment-lensing interference as a contaminant of cosmic shear
Hirata, C. M., & Seljak, U. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.063526 · Cited by 586
Bridle, S., & King, L. (2007) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/12/444 · Cited by 492
Weak Gravitational Lensing by Large-Scale Structure
Refregier, A. (2003) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.111302.102207 · Cited by 481
A halo-based galaxy group finder: calibration and application to the 2dFGRS
Yang, X., Mo, H. J., van den Bosch, F. C., & Jing, Y. P. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08560.x · Cited by 444
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jing, Y. P.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-10-01
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- L89-L93
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1995472661
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrinsic correlation of halo ellipticity and its implications for large-scale weak lensing surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05899.x
- The paper
- Jing, Y. P. (2002). Intrinsic correlation of halo ellipticity and its implications for large-scale weak lensing surveys. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05899.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.