The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 105low-redshift galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We study the relations between stellar mass, star formation history, size and internal structure for a complete sample of 122 808 galaxies drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We show that low-redshift galaxies divide into two distinct families at a stellar mass of 3 × 1010 M⊙. Lower-mass galaxies have young stellar populations, low surface mass densities and the low concentrations typical of discs. Their star formation histories are more strongly correlated with surface mass density than with stellar mass. A significant fraction of the lowest-mass galaxies in our sample have experienced recent starbursts. At given stellar mass, the sizes of low-mass galaxies are lognormally distributed with dispersion δ (ln R50) ∼ 0.5, in excellent agreement with the idea that they form with little angular momentum loss through cooling and condensation in a gravitationally dominant dark matter halo. Their median stellar surface mass density scales with stellar mass as µ* ∝ M0.54*, suggesting that the stellar mass of a disc galaxy is proportional to the three halves power of its halo mass. All of this suggests that the efficiency of the conversion of baryons into stars in low-mass galaxies increases in proportion to halo mass, perhaps as a result of supernova feedback processes. At stellar masses above 3 × 1010 M⊙, there is a rapidly increasing fraction of galaxies with old stellar populations, high surface mass densities and the high concentrations typical of bulges. In this regime, the size distribution remains lognormal, but its dispersion decreases rapidly with increasing mass and the median stellar mass surface density is approximately constant. This suggests that the star formation efficiency decreases in the highest-mass haloes, and that little star formation occurs in massive galaxies after they have assembled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033 · cited 1×
“In order to minimize the errors in this procedure, we K-correct the magnitudes of all galaxies in our sample to z = 0.1 More details about the SDSS photometric system may be found in Fukugita et al (1996) and Smith et al (2002).”
MethodInfluentialMcKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155667 · Cited by 2,082 · cited 1×
“(e.g. McKee & Ostriker 1977; Efstathiou 2000).”
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
Gunn, J. E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., Sekiguchi, M., Berry, K., Elms, B., de Haas, E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G., Lupton, R., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300645 · Cited by 1,692
Self-citation
Cited by
Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., Seibert, M., Peng, E. W., Schlegel, D. J., Uomoto, A., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423264 · Cited by 3,608
Self-citationStar Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“…of the star formation history of a galaxy has been long recognized (e.g., Gavazzi & Scodeggio 1996), but data from SDSS and subsequent surveys have reshaped our picture of the population of star-forming galaxies (e.g., Kauffmann et al. 2003; Baldry et al. 2004, 2006; Brinchmann et al. 2004).”
BackgroundConroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/1/486 · Cited by 1,891
The Second Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Abazajian, K., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Anderson, K., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., Baldry, I. K., Bastian, S., et al. (2004) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/421365 · Cited by 1,162
Self-citationPillepich, A., Nelson, D., Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Torrey, P., Weinberger, R., Vogelsberger, M., Marinacci, F., Genel, S., van der Wel, A., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2338 · Cited by 916
Metadata
- Authors
- Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., Charlot, S., Tremonti, C., Peng, E. W., Seibert, M., Brinkmann, J., Nichol, R. C., SubbaRao, M., & York, D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 341
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-69
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2018388366
- Cited by
- 1,358
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 35.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 105low-redshift galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06292.x
- The paper
- Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., Charlot, S., Tremonti, C., Peng, E. W., Seibert, M., Brinkmann, J., Nichol, R. C., SubbaRao, M., & York, D. (2003). The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 105low-redshift galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06292.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.