Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 921

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring the expanding Universe and dark energy using the statefinder diagnostic

Open access
Alam, Ujjaini, Sahni, Varun, Deep Saini, Tarun, Starobinsky, A. A.·2003·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The coming few years are likely to witness a dramatic increase in high-quality supernova data as current surveys add more high-redshift supernovae to their inventory and as newer and deeper supernova experiments become operational. Given the current variety in dark energy models and the expected improvement in observational data, an accurate and versatile diagnostic of dark energy is the need of the hour. This paper examines the statefinder diagnostic in the light of the proposed SuperNova Acceleration Probe (SNAP) satellite, which is expected to observe about 2000 supernovae per year. We show that the statefinder is versatile enough to differentiate between dark energy models as varied as the cosmological constant on one hand, and quintessence, the Chaplygin gas and braneworld models, on the other. Using SNAP data, the statefinder can distinguish a cosmological constant (w=−1) from quintessence models with w≥−0.9 and Chaplygin gas models with κ≤ 15 at the 3σ level if the value of Ωm is known exactly. The statefinder gives reasonable results even when the value of Ωm is known to only ∼20 per cent accuracy. In this case, marginalizing over Ωm and assuming a fiducial Λ-cold dark matter (LCDM) model allows us to rule out quintessence with w≥−0.85 and the Chaplygin gas with κ≤ 7 (both at 3σ). These constraints can be made even tighter if we use the statefinders in conjunction with the deceleration parameter. The statefinder is very sensitive to the total pressure exerted by all forms of matter and radiation in the Universe. It can therefore differentiate between dark energy models at moderately high redshifts of z≲ 10.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06871.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 921

Metadata

Authors
Alam, U., Sahni, V., Deep Saini, T., & Starobinsky, A. A.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2003-10
Volume
344
Issue
4
Pages
1057-1074
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2159874741
Cited by
921
References
5
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring the expanding Universe and dark energy using the statefinder diagnostic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06871.x
The paper
Alam, U., Sahni, V., Deep Saini, T., & Starobinsky, A. A. (2003). Exploring the expanding Universe and dark energy using the statefinder diagnostic. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06871.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.