The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A theoretician's analysis of the supernova data and the limitations in determining the nature of dark energy
Open accessAbstract
Current cosmological observations show a strong signature of the existence of a dark energy component with negative pressure. The most obvious candidate for this dark energy is the cosmological constant (with the equation of state wX=p/ρ=−1), which, however, raises several theoretical difficulties. This has led to models for a dark energy component that evolves with time. We discuss certain questions related to the determination of the nature of the dark energy component from observations of high-redshift supernovae. The main results of our analysis are as follows. (i) Even if the precise value of wX is known from observations, it is not possible to determine the nature of the unknown dark energy source using only kinematical and geometrical measurements. We have given explicit examples to show that different types of sources can give rise to a given wX. (ii) Although the full data set of supernova observations (which are currently available) strongly rule out models without dark energy, the high-Ψ(z > 0.25) and low- (z < 0.25) redshift data sets, individually, admit decelerating models with zero dark energy. Any possible evolution in the absolute magnitude of the supernovae, if detected, might allow the decelerating models to be consistent with the data. (iii) We have introduced two parameters, which can be obtained entirely from theory, to study the sensitivity of the luminosity distance on wX. Using these two parameters, we have argued that although one can determine the present value of wX accurately from the data, one cannot constrain the evolution of wX.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Cited by
Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova
Feng, B., Wang, X., & Zhang, X. (2005) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071 · Cited by 1,307
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2006) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271806009704 · Cited by 734
Jerk, snap and the cosmological equation of state
Visser, M. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/11/006 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Padmanabhan, T., & Choudhury, T. R.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 344
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 823-834
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2076007814
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theoretician's analysis of the supernova data and the limitations in determining the nature of dark energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06873.x
- The paper
- Padmanabhan, T., & Choudhury, T. R. (2003). A theoretician's analysis of the supernova data and the limitations in determining the nature of dark energy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06873.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.