Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A theoretician's analysis of the supernova data and the limitations in determining the nature of dark energy

Open access
Padmanabhan, T., Choudhury, T. Roy·2003·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Current cosmological observations show a strong signature of the existence of a dark energy component with negative pressure. The most obvious candidate for this dark energy is the cosmological constant (with the equation of state wX=p/ρ=−1), which, however, raises several theoretical difficulties. This has led to models for a dark energy component that evolves with time. We discuss certain questions related to the determination of the nature of the dark energy component from observations of high-redshift supernovae. The main results of our analysis are as follows. (i) Even if the precise value of wX is known from observations, it is not possible to determine the nature of the unknown dark energy source using only kinematical and geometrical measurements. We have given explicit examples to show that different types of sources can give rise to a given wX. (ii) Although the full data set of supernova observations (which are currently available) strongly rule out models without dark energy, the high-Ψ(z > 0.25) and low- (z < 0.25) redshift data sets, individually, admit decelerating models with zero dark energy. Any possible evolution in the absolute magnitude of the supernovae, if detected, might allow the decelerating models to be consistent with the data. (iii) We have introduced two parameters, which can be obtained entirely from theory, to study the sensitivity of the luminosity distance on wX. Using these two parameters, we have argued that although one can determine the present value of wX accurately from the data, one cannot constrain the evolution of wX.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06873.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Padmanabhan, T., & Choudhury, T. R.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2003-09
Volume
344
Issue
3
Pages
823-834
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2076007814
Cited by
286
References
2
FWCI
18.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theoretician's analysis of the supernova data and the limitations in determining the nature of dark energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06873.x
The paper
Padmanabhan, T., & Choudhury, T. R. (2003). A theoretician's analysis of the supernova data and the limitations in determining the nature of dark energy. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06873.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.