Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Plasticity in age and size at maturity in male guppies (Poecilia reticulata): An experimental evaluation of alternative models of development

Open access
Reznick, David N.·1990·Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

I present two models for the genesis of phenotypic variation in age and size at maturity in male guppies. Both are qualitatively consistent with the observation that age at maturity increases and size at maturity decreases as food availability (and growth rate) decline. The first model (“fixed development”) has a constant size which signals the initiation of the process of maturation and a constant time interval between the initiation and completion of maturation. There is thus no response in the pattern of development to differences in growth rate. Variation in age at maturity results from the different amounts of time required to reach the size at initiation. Variation in size results from different amounts of growth between the initiation and completion of maturation. Phenotypic variation is therefore an epiphenomenon of expressing a fixed pattern of development in different environments. In the second model (“flexible development”), fast growers initiate maturation at a larger size than slow growers; this results in a later age and larger size at maturation than their fast growing counterparts in the fixed development model. Slow growers mature at an earlier age and smaller size than their counterparts in the fixed development model. In the second model, the pattern of development changes with the environment. Two experiments with guppies demonstrate that the second model accurately describes their pattern of development. I conclude that phenotypic plasticity is in part the product of plastic development and may represent an adaptation. Testing whether or not the response is adaptive will require further investigations. A general message of this investigation is that characterizing the reaction norm alone is not sufficient to evaluate the adaptive significance of plasticity; one must also consider the processes that generate this plasticity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1990.3030185.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Reznick, D. N.
Venue
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Published
1990-05
Volume
3
Issue
3-4
Pages
185-203
ISSN
  • 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-9101
OpenAlex
W2076640829
Cited by
172
References
0
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasticity in age and size at maturity in male guppies (Poecilia reticulata): An experimental evaluation of alternative models of development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1990.3030185.x
The paper
Reznick, D. N. (1990). Plasticity in age and size at maturity in male guppies (Poecilia reticulata): An experimental evaluation of alternative models of development. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1990.3030185.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.