The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Good genes and old age: Do old mates provide superior genes?
Abstract
It has been suggested that female preference for older mates in species without parental care has evolved in response to an alleged higher genetic quality of older individuals. This is based on the widespread assumption that viability selection produces older individuals that are genetically superior to younger individuals. In contrast, we propose that the oldest individuals rarely are genetically superior. Quantitative genetic models of life history evolution indicate that young to intermediately aged individuals are likely to possess the highest breeding values of fitness. This conclusion is based on four arguments: 1) Viability selection on older individuals may decrease or at least not substantially increase breeding values of fitness, because there may exist negative genetic correlations between late‐age and early‐age life history parameters, 2) Fertility selection is likely to raise the fitness of gametes produced by young individuals more than those produced by old individuals, because the covariance between fertility and fitness often decreases with age, 3) The history of selection on their parents makes younger individuals more fit than older individuals, 4) Germ‐line mutations, which are generally deleterious, significantly decrease the breeding value of fitness of an individual throughout its lifespan, especially in males. Therefore, females that mate with the oldest males in a population are doing so for reasons other than to obtain offspring of high genetic quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Mate guarding, reproductive success and female choice in African elephants
Poole, J. H. (1989) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(89)90068-7 · Cited by 242
Cited by
Female age and sperm competition: last-male precedence declines as female age increases
Mack, P. D., Priest, N. K., & Promislow, D. E. L. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2214 · Cited by 49
Papanastasiou, S. A., Diamantidis, A. D., Nakas, C. T., Carey, J. R., & Papadopoulos, N. T. (2011) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.07.004 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, T. F., & Price, D. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 759-778
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2031180407
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good genes and old age: Do old mates provide superior genes? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1995.8060759.x
- The paper
- Hansen, T. F., & Price, D. K. (1995). Good genes and old age: Do old mates provide superior genes? Journal of Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1995.8060759.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.