The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amphipathic α helical antimicrobial peptides.: A systematic study of the effects of structural and physical properties on biological activity
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that assume an amphipathic α helical structure are widespread in nature. Their activity depends on several parameters including the sequence, size, degree of structure formation, cationicity, hydrophobicity and amphipathicity. The analysis of numerous natural AMPs provided representative values for these parameters and led to a sequence template with which to generate potent artificial lead AMPs. Sequences were then varied in a rational manner, using both natural and nonproteinogenic amino acids, to probe the individual roles of each parameter in modulating biological activity. A high cationicity combined with a stabilized amphipathic α helical structure conferred enhanced cidal activity towards all the cell types considered, and was a requirement for Gram‐positive bacteria and fungi. An elevated helicity also correlated with increased hemolytic activity. The structural requirements for activity against several Gram‐negative bacteria were instead considerably less stringent, so that it persisted in peptides in which formation of a helical structure and/or amphipathicity were impeded. Either a reduced charge or a reduced hydrophobicity resulted in generally inactive peptides. These observations, combined with the kinetics of bacterial membrane permeabilization and time‐killing are discussed in terms of currently accepted models of action for this type of peptide. The simple guidelines obtained in this study allowed the design of highly active shortened AMPs and may be generally useful in the development of this type of peptides as anti‐infective agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane
Vaara, M. (1992) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.56.3.395-411.1992 · Cited by 1,879
Cited by
QSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164
Cathelicidins - a family of multifunctional antimicrobial peptides
Bals, R., & Wilson, J. M. (2003) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS) · doi:10.1007/s00018-003-2186-9 · Cited by 427
Action of Antimicrobial Peptides against Bacterial Biofilms
Yasir, M., Willcox, M. D. P., & Dutta, D. (2018) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma11122468 · Cited by 319
Biomimetic antimicrobial polymers: recent advances in molecular design
Ergene, C., Yasuhara, K., & Palermo, E. F. (2018) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8py00012c · Cited by 312
Antimicrobial Peptides: Current Status and Therapeutic Potential
Koczulla, A. R., & Bals, R. (2003) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200363040-00005 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Giangaspero, A., Sandri, L., & Tossi, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 5589-5600
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W1516030996
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amphipathic α helical antimicrobial peptides.: A systematic study of the effects of structural and physical properties on biological activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2001.02494.x
- The paper
- Giangaspero, A., Sandri, L., & Tossi, A. (2001). Amphipathic α helical antimicrobial peptides.: A systematic study of the effects of structural and physical properties on biological activity. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2001.02494.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.