Cited by 71Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteinsAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionEnzyme Structure and Function

Purification and characterization of a membrane‐bound enzyme complex from the sulfate‐reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus related to heterodisulfide reductase from methanogenic archaea

Open access
Mander, Gerd J., Duin, Evert C., Linder, Dietmar, Stetter, Karl O., Hedderich, Reiner·2002·European Journal of Biochemistry

Abstract

Heterodisulfide reductase (Hdr) is a unique disulfide reductase that plays a key role in the energy metabolism of methanogenic archaea. The genome of the sulfate‐reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus encodes several proteins of unknown function with high sequence similarity to the catalytic subunit of Hdr. Here we report on the purification of a multisubunit membrane‐bound enzyme complex from A. fulgidus that contains a subunit related to the catalytic subunit of Hdr. The purified enzyme is a heme/iron‐sulfur protein, as deduced by UV/Vis spectroscopy, EPR spectroscopy, and the primary structure. It is composed of four different subunits encoded by a putative transcription unit (AF499, AF501–AF503). A fifth protein (AF500) encoded by this transcription unit could not be detected in the purified enzyme preparation. Subunit AF502 is closely related to the catalytic subunit HdrD of Hdr from Methanosarcina barkeri. AF501 encodes a membrane‐integral cytochrome, and AF500 encodes a second integral membrane protein. AF499 encodes an extracytoplasmic iron‐sulfur protein, and AF503 encodes an extracytoplasmic c‐type cytochrome with three heme c‐binding motifs. All of the subunits show high sequence similarity to proteins encoded by the dsr locus of Allochromatium vinosum and to subunits of the Hmc complex from Desulfovibrio vulgaris. The heme groups of the enzyme are rapidly reduced by reduced 2,3‐dimethyl‐1,4‐naphthoquinone (DMNH 2), which indicates that the enzyme functions as a menaquinol–acceptor oxidoreductase. The physiological electron acceptor has not yet been identified. Redox titrations monitored by EPR spectroscopy were carried out to characterize the iron‐sulfur clusters of the enzyme. In addition to EPR signals due to [4Fe‐4S]+ clusters, signals of an unusual paramagnetic species with g values of 2.031, 1.994, and 1.951 were obtained. The paramagnetic species could be reduced in a one‐electron transfer reaction, but could not be further oxidized, and shows EPR properties similar to those of a paramagnetic species recently identified in Hdr. In Hdr this paramagnetic species is specifically induced by the substrates of the enzyme and is thought to be an intermediate of the catalytic cycle. Hence, Hdr and the A. fulgidus enzyme not only share sequence similarity, but may also have a similar active site and a similar catalytic function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02839.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two membrane complexes having quinone-interacting subunits, QmoABC and DsrMKJOP, are probable electron donors to AprBA and DsrAB.

    “A link between the two started to emerge with the identification of two membrane complexes having quinone-interacting subunits, QmoABC and DsrMKJOP, as probable electron donors to AprBA and DsrAB [191–193].”

    From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [191]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mander, G. J., Duin, E. C., Linder, D., Stetter, K. O., & Hedderich, R.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Venue
European Journal of Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-04
Volume
269
Issue
7
Pages
1895-1904
ISSN
  • 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1033
OpenAlex
W2062195385
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
heterodisulfide reductase, Archaeoglobus fulgidus, disulfide reductase, cytochromes, iron-sulfur clusters, redox titration
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Catalysis, Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Heme, Molecular Sequence Data, Multienzyme Complexes, Oxidation-Reduction, Oxidoreductases, Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet, Archaeoglobus, DNA, Archaeal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review